BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Vasiliy Vasilyevich BARANOV v Ukraine - 6764/07 [2010] ECHR 738 (27 April 2010) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/738.html Cite as: [2010] ECHR 738 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
FIFTH SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
6764/07
by Vasiliy Vasilyevich BARANOV
against Ukraine
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 27 April 2010 as a Chamber composed of:
Peer
Lorenzen,
President,
Renate
Jaeger,
Rait
Maruste,
Mark
Villiger,
Isabelle
Berro-Lefèvre,
Zdravka
Kalaydjieva,
judges,
Mykhaylo
Buromenskiy, ad
hoc judge,
and
Claudia Westerdiek, Section
Registrar
Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 December 2006,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The application was lodged by Mr Vasiliy Vasilyevich Baranov, a Ukrainian national who was born in 1952. He was represented before the Court by S.A. Bezkrovnyy, a lawyer practising in Nova Kahovka. The Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Yuriy Zaytsev.
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of the judgment given in his favour against a State entity.
On 14 January 2009 the President of the Fifth Section decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, to communicate the application to the Government.
By letter of 29 December 2009, the applicant's lawyer informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 5 November 2009. There was no person expressing the wish to pursue the application.
THE LAW
In the light of the foregoing, the Court finds that there exists no general interest in the present case which necessitates proceeding with the examination of the complaints raised. Accordingly, the conditions in which a case may be struck out of its list, as provided in Article 37 § 1 of the Convention, are satisfied.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Claudia Westerdiek Peer Lorenzen
Registrar President