FIFTH SECTION

CASE OF SHTABOVENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

(Application no. 22722/07 and 99 other applications)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

25 April 2013

This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Shtabovenko and Others v. Ukraine,
The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
	Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,
	Ann Power-Forde,
	Helena Jäderblom, judges,
and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 2 April 2013,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1.  The case originated in 100 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, a company based in Ukraine and a Russian national, whose details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).
2.  The applicant Mr Viktor Andriyovych Bondar died (application no. 13890/09). His wife, Ms Nadiya Yefremivna Bondar, manifested a wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
3.  By letter dated 19 December 2012, the Government informed the Court that the applicant Mr Vladimir Shabodinovich Khamzatov (application no. 33262/10) had died. A copy of the letter was forwarded to the deceased applicant’s address on 19 February 2013 by registered post for comments to be submitted by 11 March 2013. The reader was warned that in the absence of response, the Court would assume that the applicant had died and that no individual was entitled and wished to pursue the application. No reply was received.
4.  By letter dated 27 October 2012 the applicant Ms Olena Georgiyivna Mykhaylova (application no. 475/11) informed the Court that she wanted to withdraw the application since the judgment rendered in her favour had been fully enforced.
5.  The Government (“the Government”) are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.
6.  On 4 October 2012 the applications above were communicated to the Government of Ukraine.
7.  The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 63882/09 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.
THE FACTS
THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE
8.  On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became final and enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.
9.  Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.
THE LAW
I.  THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 13890/09
10.  The Court considers that the applicant’s wife in application no. 13890/09 (see paragraph 2 above) has standing to continue the proceedings in the applicant’s stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine, no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).
II.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1
11.  The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. They relied on, expressly or in substance, Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
A.  Applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2
12.  The Court considers that the applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2 should be joined, given their common factual and legal background.
1.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 1
13.  In their observations the Government submitted that the debtor in respect of the judgments indicated in Appendix 1 was a private company. However, between 28 November 2005 and 30 July 2010 the Fuel and Energy (Complex Enterprises) Register included the debtor in the procedure for recovery of debts pursuant to the 2005 Act on measures designed to ensure the stable functioning of fuel and energy enterprises and all enforcement proceedings in respect of it were frozen. Therefore, the Government bore responsibility for the debtor’s actions from the moment when the applicants’ judgments became final and until it was excluded from the Register. They argued that those periods could not be considered excessive. As regards the period after 30 July 2010, the Government, referring to the Court’s case law (see Dovgal v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 50726/06, 20 October 2009), maintained that the State was responsible for the non-enforcement in the applicant’s favour only insofar as the State Bailiffs’ Service was involved, while the applicants had not challenged before the domestic courts the Bailiffs’ alleged inactivity in the enforcement of their judgments. Given the above the Government claimed that the applications should be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded.
14.  Given its findings in previous similar cases against Ukraine (see, for instance, Andreyenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 22312/03, 19 June 2007 and Gapeyev v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 21659/06, 17 November 2009), the Court considers that these applications must be declared inadmissible pursuant to Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
2.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 2
15.  The Government submitted in their observations that the debtor in respect of the judgments specified in Appendix 2 was a private legal entity. They reiterated that the State’s positive obligation to enforce the judgments against a private entity extends no further than the involvement of State bodies in the enforcement proceedings. They claimed that the applicants’ complaints are manifestly ill-founded given that they failed to challenge the actions of the State Bailiffs’ Service.
16.  The Court observes that the parties’ submissions did not disclose that there were any factors, attributable to the State, which impeded or blocked the enforcement of the judgments at issue for an excessively long period of time. In any event it appeared after the communication of the applications to the respondent Government that on 5 July 2007, that is more than six months before the applications were lodged with this Court, the debtor had been finally liquidated without legal successor due to bankruptcy and excluded from the State companies register. These applications must, therefore, be declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded pursuant to Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
B.  Applications tabulated in Appendix 3
17.  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.
18.  The Court notes that the applicant in application no. 33262/10, Mr Vladimir Shabodinovich Khamzatov, has died and that no heir has requested permission to pursue the application.
19.  It also notes that the applicant in application no. 475/11, Ms Olena Georgiyivna Mykhaylova, informed the Court that she did not intend to pursue the application since the judgment, rendered in her favour had been fully enforced.
20.  In the light of the foregoing, and in the absence of any special circumstances regarding respect for the rights guaranteed by the Convention or its Protocols, the Court, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, considers that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the applications out of the list.
C.  Applications tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5
21.  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issue raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.
22.  The Court notes that the above complaints of the applicants tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5 (see paragraph 11 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.
23.  The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.
24.  Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov, cited above, §§ 56-58 and 66-70), the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.
III.  OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION
25.  Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.
26.  It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.
IV.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
27.  Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
28.  In the present case, bearing in mind its previous decision on the matter (see Kharuk and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non‑enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix 4) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix 5). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.
29.  The Court further notes that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.
30.  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
1.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendices 1 and 2;

2.  Declares inadmissible the applications indicated in Appendices 1 and 2;

3.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendix 3;

4.  Decides to strike the applications enumerated in Appendix 3 out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention;

5.  Decides to join the applications tabulated in Appendices 4 and 5;

6.  Declares the complaints of the applicants listed in Appendices 4 and 5, under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints, admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;

7.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;

8.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;

9.  Holds
(a)  that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 4 and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 5 in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 April 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
	Stephen Phillips	Boštjan M. Zupančič
	Deputy Registrar	President

APPENDIX 1
(inadmissible applications)

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth
	Relevant domestic decision	
1.		63284/09
17/11/2009	Nadiya Kostyantynivna KRAVCHENYUK
11/08/1959	Oleksandriya Court, 05/05/2009	
2.		63328/09
17/11/2009	Tetyana Yuriyivna PASICHNA
19/04/1960	Oleksandriya Court, 05/05/2009	

APPENDIX 2
(inadmissible applications)

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decision	
3.		6147/11
14/01/2011	Olga Illivna YAKOVENKO
19/08/1951	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/03/2005	
4.		6164/11
14/01/2011	Stanislav Viktorovych TSARENKO
01/01/1971	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 20/12/2004	
5.		6214/11
14/01/2010	Volodymyr Panteliyovych PALIYENKO
19/07/1944	Krukivskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 24/05/2004	

APPENDIX 3
(applications struck out of the Court’s list of cases)

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decision	
6.		33262/10
25/05/2010	Vladimir Shabodinovich KHAMZATOV
01/01/1948	1) Torez Court, 16/04/2008

2) Torez Court, 16/07/2008

3) Torez Court, 18/07/2008	
7.		475/11
13/12/2010	Olena Georgiyivna MYKHAYLOVA
01/01/1964	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 07/04/2010	

APPENDIX 4
(non-enforcement delays three years and more)

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	
Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions	
8.		22722/07
05/05/2007	Vasyl Petrovych SHTABOVENKO
27/12/1952	Tsentralnyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 18/04/2002	
9.		13890/09
18/02/2009	Viktor Andriyovych BONDAR
09/03/1939	Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007	
10.		57014/09
19/10/2009	Valeriy Volodymyrovych SACHEK
02/04/1966	Ovruch Court, 03/04/2002	
11.		59484/09
02/11/2009	Mariya Yosypivna TABACHUK
04/07/1949	Popilnyanskyy District Court of the Zhytomyr Region, 30/10/2006, as amended by the Zhytomyr Regional Court of Appeal, 17/01/2008	
12.		59562/09
28/10/2009	Oksana Vladimirovna SECHKAREVA
18/10/1982	Krasnyy Luch Court, 11/10/2006	
13.		59650/09
22/10/2009	Oleksandr Volodymyrovych BURYAK
27/06/1955	1) Oleksandriya Court, 29/01/2008, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 05/11/2008

2) Oleksandriya Court, 15/04/2008, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/12/2008	
14.		59976/09
09/11/2009	Mykola Viktorovych TOCHENYY
13/05/1963	Obolonskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/09/2003, quashed by the Higher Administrative Court on 02/11/2010	
15.		60221/09
26/10/2009	Anatoliy Ivanovych GUMONITSKYY
01/01/1950	Tetiyiv Court, 31/01/2008	
16.		60971/09
05/11/2009	Mykola Stepanovych VASYLYK
21/01/1967	Kolomyya Court, 09/12/2004	
17.		61111/09
04/11/2009	Viktor Sergiyovych YALPUTA
19/09/1954	Oleksandriya Court, 15/05/2008	
18.		61123/09
01/11/2009	Anatoliy Ivanovich YELISEYEV
06/01/1947	1) Novogrodivka Court, 31/07/2002

2) Decision of a Labour Disputes Commission of the Novogrodivska Mine, lodged with the State Bailiffs’ Service on 16 April 2004. 	
19.		61576/09
16/11/2009	Andriy Mykolayovych BARDAS
07/09/1968	Military Court of the Cherkassy Garrison, 31/08/2005	
20.		61892/09
11/11/2009	Mykola Tykhonovych GORBACHUK
25/01/1949	Solomyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/01/2006	
21.		62027/09
11/11/2009	Svitlana Mykolayivna BYSHA
06/01/1946	Oleksandriya Court, 11/02/2008	
22.		62319/09
12/11/2009	Olena Fedorivna DAVYSKYBA
25/08/1932	Trostyanets Court, 15/05/2007	
23.		62469/09
19/11/2009	Anatoliy Andriyovych MAKSYMENKO
29/09/1959	Lubny Court, 19/06/2007	
24.		63000/09
27/10/2009	Svetlana Nikiforovna CHERNOVA
15/04/1964	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 05/02/2007	
25.		63028/09
27/10/2009	Larisa Ivanovna KLIPENKO
21/06/1951	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise , 05/02/2007	
26.		63090/09
27/10/2009	Mariya Vasilyevna BUT
12/02/1947	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidniy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 27/02/2007	
27.		63100/09
27/10/2009	Nina Vasilyevna LITVINOVA
25/06/1950	Kostyantynivka Court, 15/10/2004	
28.		63106/09
27/10/2009	Lyudmila Alekseyevna KOROLEVA
16/01/1942	Kostyantynivka Court, 29/03/2001	
29.		63114/09
27/10/2009	Lidiya Ivanovna TISHCHENKO
06/10/1941	Kostyantynivka Court, 25/08/2005	
30.		63123/09
27/10/2009	Vladimir Vladimirovich PASECHNIK
13/11/1970	Kostyantynivka Court, 22/12/1997 	
31.		63132/09
27/10/2009	Igor Viktorovich MIROSHNICHENKO
02/04/1971	Kostyantynivka Court, 14/03/2003 	
32.		63150/09
27/10/2009	Eduard Mikhaylovich SOLOVYEV
27/06/1969	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 22/12/1997

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 27/01/2003	
33.		63157/09
27/10/2009	Lyudmila Andreyevna GORCHAKOVA
22/11/1937	Kostyantynivka Court, 02/04/2001	
34.		63163/09
27/10/2009	Yekaterina Vasilyevna NESTERENKO
21/10/1956	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 02/08/2002

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 18/04/2003	
35.		63180/09
27/10/2009	Yevgeniy Nikolayevich GUZHVA
02/01/1968	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 30/09/2004

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 20/10/2004

3) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise, 14/07/2006	
36.		63198/09
27/10/2009	Lyudmila Alekseyevna SEMCHISHYNA
07/08/1927	Kostyantynivka Court, 02/04/2001	
37.		63206/09
27/10/2009	Yekaterina Vasilyevna IVASHCHENKO
19/03/1952	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise, 05/02/2007	
38.		63212/09
27/10/2009	Zhanetta Petrovna SHUBINA
08/11/1932	Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise, 12/03/2001	
39.		63213/09
27/10/2009	Natalya Vladimirovna MADYUDYA
15/10/1971	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 27/12/2000

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/05/2009	
40.		63217/09
27/10/2009	Vadim Aleksandrovich STAROSTENKO
29/05/1962	Kostyantynivka Court, 01/02/2002	
41.		63224/09
27/10/2009	Nina Stepanovna GEBUZA
09/10/1937	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/11/2002

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/11/2002	
42.		63226/09
27/10/2009	Valentina Ivanovna KUSHCHENKOVA
07/04/1957	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 11/12/1997

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 19/03/2001	
43.		63230/09
27/10/2009	Nina Alekseyevna VOLKOVA
23/11/1957	Kostyantynivka Court, 25/01/2002	
44.		63235/09
27/10/2009	Tatyana Gennadyevna SAKHNO
31/01/1956	Labour Disputes Commission of the Ukrayinskyy Naukovo-Doslidnyy Instytut Skla, State Enterprise , 05/11/2007	
45.		63365/09
27/10/2009	Valentin Borisovich GOLOVCHENKO
07/07/1948	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 08/04/2002

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 23/01/2009	
46.		63369/09
18/11/2009	Applicant 2:

Ivan Petrovich KOROLKOV
01/01/1940	1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/02/2007

2) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 20/03/2007	
47.		63374/09
27/10/2009	Lidiya Prokofyevna ORLOVA
05/04/1939	Kostyantynivka Court, 17/09/2004	
48.		63379/09
27/10/2009	Mikhail Mikhaylovich NEDOPEKIN
08/10/1950	Labour Disputes Commission of the Avtosklo, State Enterprise , 12/04/2003	
49.		63385/09
27/10/2009	Stanislav Stepanovich GURKOVSKIY
11/09/1959	Kostyantynivka Court, 26/01/2009	
50.		63393/09
27/10/2009	Irina Ivanovna SHTOFEL
10/02/1955	Kostyantynivka Court, 03/03/2005	
51.		63399/09
27/10/2009	Aleksandr Mikhaylovich SHTOFEL
22/10/1949	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 03/04/2003

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 13/06/2006	
52.		63401/09
27/10/2009	Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOVAL
17/12/1950	Kostyantynivka Court, 23/09/2002	
53.		63408/09
27/10/2009	Vladimir Ivanovich KIYAN
02/04/1954	Kostyantynivka Court, 13/11/2001	
54.		63413/09
27/10/2009	Nikolay Vasilyevich DUDNIK
20/01/1937	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Tekhbudsklo, State Enterprise, 25/09/2002

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 03/03/2009	
55.		63418/09
27/10/2009	Valentina Ivanovna LISTRATENKO
01/10/1946	Kostyantynivka Court, 15/11/2001	
56.		63425/09
27/10/2009	Galina Vladimirovna DUNAYTSEVA
28/02/1949	Kostyantynivka Court, 23/10/2002	
57.		63435/09
27/10/2009	Alla Nikolayevna BOZHKO
18/03/1964	Kostyantynivka Court, 05/09/2002	
58.		63479/09
27/10/2009	Olga Yefimovna GLADILINA
01/12/1947	1) Kostyantynivka Court, 14/05/2003

2) Kostyantynivka Court, 28/04/2004	
59.		63569/09
17/11/2009	Sergiy Stepanovych NAKONECHNYY
01/01/1959	Tetiyiv Court, 04/12/2007	
60.		63866/09
27/10/2009	Valentina Demyanovna KUZOVENINA
30/12/1948	Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/10/2007	
61.		63882/09
23/11/2009	Anastasiya Semenovna DIKAREVA
31/10/1934	Sieverodonetsk Court, 18/07/2008	
62.		64434/09
26/11/2009	Lyubov Yakivna LYAKHOVA
24/04/1948	1) Bakhchisaray Court, 11/02/2004

2) Bakhchisaray Court, 19/04/2007	
63.		65379/09
30/11/2009	Sergey Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV
02/10/1966	Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/10/2008	
64.		65682/09
24/11/2009	Andrey Vladimirovich LOBANOV
11/11/1976	Novogrodivka Court, 02/11/2005	
65.		67048/09
10/12/2009	Pavlo Vasylyovych KOZIYCHUK
04/01/1931	Bershad Court, 28/05/2009	
66.		1197/10
22/12/2009	Nina Dmytrivna VALENTYUK
13/09/1955

Mariya Opanasivna VALENTYUK
20/11/1929

Dmytro Anatoliyovych VALENTYUK
01/01/1984

Valentyna Anatoliyivna KLIMCHUK
30/07/1976	Khmelnytskyy Court, 07/04/2005, as amended by the Khmelnytskyy Regional Court of Appeal on 21/10/2005	
67.		19486/10
18/03/2010	Anatoliy Vyacheslavovich VLADIMIRSKIY
12/09/1957	1) Bryanka Court, 18/04/2006

2) Bryanka Court, 17/06/2008	
68.		24423/10
19/04/2010	Olena Vasylivna MORDOVINA
28/07/1959	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise «Khimprom», 10/12/2007

2) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise «Khimprom», 18/02/2008

3) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/06/2008	
69.		25755/10
23/04/2010	Igor Oleksandrovych BALESNYY
16/11/1975	Krasnyy Lyman Court, 12/12/2003	
70.		37249/10
21/06/2010	Mykola Grygorovych PETNYAK
20/02/1966	Galytskyy District Court of Lviv, 22/07/2009	
71.		46988/10
23/07/2010	Sergey Ivanovich MAYMURENKO
02/05/1947	1) Kramatorsk Court, 21/01/2009

2) Kramatorsk Court, 21/01/2009	
72.		48871/10
30/07/2010	Yaroslava Petrivna VIVCHAR
10/04/1955	Lychakivskyy District Court of Lviv, 23/06/2009	
73.		63837/10
18/10/2010	Anatoliy Grygorovych VORONKO
24/01/1939	Dniprovskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/05/2007	
74.		67118/10
08/11/2010	Vasyl Dmytrovych NYZOVETS
01/09/1923	1) Shepetivka Court, 18/12/2007, as amended by the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal on 30/09/2008

2) Shepetivka Court, 26/02/2009	
75.		70818/10
17/11/2010	Viktor Pavlovych OBLOG
08/11/1955
Shostka	Shostka Court, 26/12/2008	
76.		70849/10
22/11/2010	MZHK MRIYA, TOV	Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 02/04/2007	
77.		71165/10
20/11/2010	Anatoliy Petrovych SANEVYCH
04/11/1962	Zhytomyr Regional Administrative Court, 27/09/2007	
78.		72636/10
29/11/2010	Valentina Viktorovna PROKOPENKO
19/05/1962	Pervomayskyy Court, 22/08/2008	
79.		73013/10
29/11/2010	Valentina Nikolayevna SOKOLOVA
01/01/1965	Pervomayskyy Court, 10/07/2008	
80.		73067/10
01/12/2010	Olga Petrivna KALASHNYUK
01/01/1939	Tetiyiv Court, 29/11/2007	
81.		73241/10
30/11/2010	Tatyana Ivanovna POKHODZHAY
23/08/1953	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the Pervomayskyy State Enterprise “Khimprom”, 10/12/2007

2) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/07/2008	
82.		73818/10
20/11/2010	Iryna Ivanivna GULCHAK
01/01/1954	Staromiskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 29/07/2002	
83.		73882/10
26/10/2010	Sergey Nikolayevich PUGACH
17/02/1967	Novogrodivka Court, 06/11/1996 	
84.		74828/10
29/11/2010	Galina Vasilyevna MAKSIMOVICH
01/01/1952	Pervomayskyy Court, 09/07/2008	
85.		1330/11
22/12/2010	Viktor Ivanovych KOLOSOV
01/01/1946	1) Lysychansk Court, 03/02/2005

2) Lysychansk Court, 05/04/2005	
86.		1397/11
21/12/2010	Anatoliy Dmytrovych KOLYADA
15/11/1957	Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 08/10/2009	
87.		1437/11
20/12/2010	Anatoliy Kirillovich YOVZHENKO
28/03/1949	1) Selydove Court, 18/02/2009

2) Selydove Court, 20/02/2009	
88.		2016/11
27/12/2010	Vladimir Ivanovich MALYUK
08/08/1955	Lysychansk Court, 25/11/2008	
89.		3203/11
17/11/2010	Viktor Pavlovych OBLOG
08/11/1955	Shostka Court, 30/06/2009	
90.		4481/11
28/12/2010	Vladimir Ivanovich MALYUK
08/08/1955	Lysychansk Court, 04/09/2008	
91.		5406/11
12/01/2011	Mykola Yuriyovych PRYSHCHEPA
01/01/1948	Tetiyiv Court, 26/11/2007	
92.		5779/11
13/11/2011	Nikolay Pavlovich ZAKHAROV
01/05/1949	Lugansk Regional Commercial Court, 20/05/2003	
93.		5836/11
15/01/2011	Volodymyr Vasylyovych ZAMRYKOTA
04/09/1960	Fastiv Court, 05/03/2008	
94.		5844/11
12/01/2011	Tamara Volodymyrivna ILYASHEVA
25/04/1951	Lysychansk Court, 02/02/2005	
95.		5965/11
13/01/2011	Svitlana Fedorivna SHEMYAKINA
09/10/1944	Lysychansk Court, 20/01/2005	

APPENDIX 5
(non-enforcement delays less than three years)

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicant name
date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions	
46.	63369/09
18/11/2009	Applicant 1:

Vladislav Valentinovich VOROBYEV
20/11/1940	1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 16/02/2007

2) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 20/03/2007	
96.		27326/10
13/04/2010	Nikolay Vasilyevich PETUSHKOV 13/12/1956

Fedor Viktorovich MAKAROV
26/09/1954	Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal, 16/10/2009	
97.		56006/10
14/09/2010	Oleksandr Grygorovych MASHCHENKO
20/08/1981	Sevastopol Administrative Court of Appeal, 19/05/2010	
98.		477/11
13/12/2010	Tetyana Pavlivna DOLGOVA
01/01/1952	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 12/04/2010	
99.		480/11
13/12/2010	Olena Anatoliyivna OLIYNYK
01/01/1953	Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 05/10/2009	
100.		5747/11
15/01/2011	Sergey Georgiyevich CHURSIN
01/01/1956	Tsentralno-Miskyy Court of Makiyivka, 28/04/2010