BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Hormann and Moser v. Austria - 31176/13 - Legal Summary [2015] ECHR 650 (29 May 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2015/650.html Cite as: [2015] ECHR 650 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Information Note on the Court’s case-law 186
June 2015
Hörmann and Moser v. Austria - 31176/13
Article 14
Discrimination
Conclusion of registered partnership and civil marriage before different authorities: communicated See: [2015] ECHR 645
[This summary also covers the communicated case of Dietz and Suttasom v. Austria, no. 31185/13]. See: [2015] ECHR 644
The applicants, homosexual couples, applied to the Office for Matters of Personal Status to contract a civil marriage. They further stated that in case they were denied the conclusion of a civil marriage, they wished to apply for the conclusion of a registered partnership, but only if the conclusion were to take place before the Office for Matters of Personal Status. Their application for the conclusion of a civil marriage was dismissed as, under the Civil Code, civil marriage could only be concluded by two persons of the opposite sex. The Office for Matters of Personal Status also dismissed their application for a registered partnership as such a partnership could only be concluded before the District Administrative Authority. The applicants unsuccessfully appealed against that decision before the administrative authorities and the domestic courts.
The applicants complain under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8 that they were discriminated against on grounds of their sexual orientation, because registered partnerships (which are open exclusively to same-sex couples) are concluded before the District Administrative Authorities, while civil marriage (which can only be concluded by two persons of the opposite sex) is contracted before the Office for Matters of Personal Status.
Communicated on 29 May 2015 under Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8.
