European Court of Human Rights

Resolution CM/ResDH(2015)155
Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in
Thirty-four cases against Italy

 

Application No.	Case	Judgment of	Final on
24818/03	ARMANDO IANNELLI	12/02/2013	12/05/2013
20619/03+	ASCIERTO AND BUFFOLINO	05/11/2013	05/11/2013
15015/03+	BENCIVENGA AND OTHERS	05/11/2013	05/11/2013
18477/03	TIZIANO BIANCHI	02/11/2010	02/02/2011
19876/03+	BONALZOO S.R.L.	07/12/2010	07/03/2011
62156/00	BONASIA AND POZZI	08/07/2008	08/10/2008
24817/03	ANGELO CARUSO	02/04/2013	02/04/2013
3978/03	CONCERIA MADERA S.R.L. No. 2	21/09/2010	21/12/2010
43465/02	COOPERATIVA ‘SANNIO VERDE’ S.R.L.	15/11/2012	15/11/2012
32671/03	DI BRITA	14/10/2008	14/01/2009
1452/03	FONTANA	13/11/2008	13/02/2009
32740/02+	GALASSO AND OTHERS	16/07/2013	16/07/2013
28104/02+	GHIROTTI AND BENASSI	06/04/2010	06/07/2010
13175/03	GIUSTI	18/10/2011	18/01/2012
11213/04	LANDINO	16/03/2010	16/06/2010
24886/03	MAIO	18/03/2008	18/06/2008
37947/02+	MARTINETTI AND CAVAZZUTI	20/04/2010	20/07/2010
32810/02	MARZOLA CENTRI DI FISIOKINESITERAPIA S.A.S.	16/03/2010	16/06/2010
62250/00	MAUGERI SILVIO	08/07/2008	08/10/2008
37197/03	MEZZAPESA AND PLATI	24/04/2012	24/04/2012
34389/02+	PACIFICO AND OTHERS	15/11/2012	15/02/2013
39567/02	PARENTI (HEIR) AND DEIDDA	25/09/2012	25/09/2012
27036/03+	SALVATORE AND OTHERS	18/01/2011	18/01/2011
11013/04+	SANCHIRICO AND LAMORTE	16/03/2010	16/06/2010
44031/02+	STREGA ALBERTI BENEVENTO S.P.A.	09/11/2010	09/02/2011
64897/01	ZULLO ERNESTINA	29/03/2006	Grand Chamber
20191/03	ARAGOSA	18/12/2007	18/03/2008
62354/00	BIEFFE RIFUGI ANTIATOMICI S.R.L.	08/07/2008	08/10/2008
45836/99	CAPONE AND CENTRELLA	16/10/2007	31/03/2008
62155/00	PROVIDE S.R.L.	05/07/2007	05/10/2007
39933/03	BUONFARDIECI	18/12/2007	18/03/2008
41062/05	CAPRIATI	26/07/2011	26/07/2011
20193/03+	PISCITELLI AND OTHERS	12/10/2010	12/01/2011
36624/02	SILVERI No.2	19/10/2010	19/01/2011

 

(Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 24 September 2015
at the 1236th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)

 

 

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),

 

Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established;

 

Recalling that in these cases the Court found a violation of the Convention only in relation to the insufficient amount of compensation awarded by domestic jurisdictions following “Pinto” proceedings;

 

Recalling also the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:

 

-       of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and

-       of general measures preventing similar violations;

 

Having noted that the just satisfaction, where awarded, has been paid by the government of the respondent State and that the domestic proceedings covered by the “Pinto” procedures are terminated;

 

Having also noted that the Italian jurisdictions now constantly award, under the “Pinto” Law, compensation that is compliant with the case-law of the Court;

 

Recalling that the Committee continues its examination of the outstanding questions relating to the “Pinto” remedy (in particular, delay in the payment of the compensation; excessive length of “Pinto” proceedings; access to the “Pinto” remedy made conditional upon the termination of the main proceedings and no possibility for compensation for proceedings that have lasted six years or less) within the framework of the other cases of the Giuseppe Mostacciuolo group and the Gaglione and Others case,

 

DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed above and

 

DECIDES to close their examination.