BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
European Court of Human Rights |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> KINZHABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 35579/21 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : First Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 321 (11 April 2024) URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/321.html Cite as: [2024] ECHR 321 |
||
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
FIRST SECTION
CASE OF KINZHABAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 35579/21 and 19 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
11 April 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Kinzhabayeva and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Lətif Hüseynov, President,
Ivana Jelić,
Erik Wennerström, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 21 March 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10-11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 April 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Lətif Hüseynov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
28/06/2021 | Yuliya Nikolayevna KINZHABAYEVA 1997 | Bochilo Anna Yevgenyevna Barnaul | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Chelyabinsk
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Chelyabinsk Regional Court 28/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
16/07/2021 | Andrey Gennadyevich SUKHANOV 1984 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Volgograd
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Volgograd Regional Court 13/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 3.30 p.m. to 11.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 | 4,000 | |
19/07/2021 | Ilya Borisovich PAKHOMOV 1993 | Gimadi Vyacheslav Ilyich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Moscow
17/01/2021 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Moscow City Court 18/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances": - from 7.35 p.m. to 10.20 p.m. on 17/01/2021, while a record of administrative offence was drawn on 22/02/2021; - from 11.30 p.m. on 27/01/2021 to 9.30 a.m. on 28/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
30/07/2021 | Angelina Sergeyevna LEVINA 1992 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Tambov
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 15 days | Tambov Regional Court 05/02/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 5,000 | |
27/07/2021 | Marina Petrovna LIMAR 1987 | Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Moscow, Komsomolskaya Square
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
25/07/2021 | Galina Yevgenyevna MANENKOVA 1971 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Smolensk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Smolensk Regional Court 10/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - detained and escorted to a court on 29/01/2021. After the applicant had voluntary come to the police station, she was escorted to the first-instance hearing in her administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
28/07/2021 | Ulyana Dmitriyevna KOLUSENKO 1993 | Sotnikov Dmitriy Valeryevich Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Moscow City Court 11/02/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
05/08/2021 | Anastasiya Igorevna KRIVENKO 1999 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy
Tambov
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 7 days | Tambov Regional Court 17/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.50 p.m. on 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
09/08/2021 | Timur Shakhinovich BABAYEV 1996 |
| Rally "Free Navalnyy
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | Moscow City Court 09/02/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
07/08/2021 | Elina Aleksandrovna PULUDI 1963 |
| Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 2.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case; the applicant spent 7 hours in the police van | 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Yaroslav Igorevich TIKHONOV 1988 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yaroslavl
23/01/2021
Rally "Free Navalnyy
Yaroslavl
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO
article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000
fine of RUB 10,000 | Yaroslavl Regional Court 14/05/2021
Yaroslavl Regional Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 2.00 p.m. to 6.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 | 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Tatyana Yuryevna SHISHKINA 1966 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 12.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021 in the morning,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Dmitriy Segeyevich BATALIN 1995 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yaroslavl
23/01/2021
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Yaroslavl Regional Court 15/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 3.30 p.m. to 10.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021
| 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Roman Ramilevich NAZIROV 1995 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tula
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Tula Regional Court 02/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 2.00 p.m. to 10.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Mikhail Aleksandrovich KREYNES 1987 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 16/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 1.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
23/08/2021 | Rasul Ayratovich MULLATAGIROV 1994 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Ufa
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Bashkortostan Republic 05/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 12.50 p.m. to 3.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
25/07/2021 | Aleksandr Aleksandrovich BYKOV 1990 | Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | administrative detention of 8 days | Moscow City Court 13/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 1.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 5,000 | |
17/09/2021 | Dmitriy Gennadyevich CHESNOKOV 1998 | Kosnyrev Vladislav Vladimirovich Syktyvkar | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Syktyvkar
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 17/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 1.40 p.m. to 7.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Viktor Andreyevich SPERANSKIY 1991 | Aksenova Darya Dmitriyevna Kolomna | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 26/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence on 23/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
08/10/2021 | Aleksandr Vladimirovich VELIKIY 1991 | Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 14/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without "exceptional circumstances", from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021, hearing in the applicant's administrative-offence case | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
