[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Pinnock v Croydon Church Housing Association [2001] EWCA Civ 1763 (8 November 2001) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1763.html Cite as: [2001] EWCA Civ 1763

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE CROYDON COUNTY COURT
(HIS HONOUR JUDGE T A C CONINGSBY QC)

		Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday 8 November 2001

1. LORD JUSTICE BUXTON: In this renewed application, there is no appearance by Mr Pinnock. He has given no indication to the court of any reason why he is either delayed or not able to attend. In those circumstances, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution subject to this condition. When this order is drawn, a copy of it will be sent by first-class post to Mr Pinnock. The order will thereafter not pass the seal for 7 days after the date of dispatch to Mr Pinnock, during which time he may apply to the court in writing to indicate reasons why the matter should be reinstated. That will be contained in the order.
2. I will add as part of my judgment that Mr Pinnock will have to produce very cogent reasons why the matter should be reinstated. It will not be enough for him simply to make formal application.
Order: Application dismissed for want of prosecution.