BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Bhamjee v Norwich Union General Insurance [2002] EWCA Civ 738 (22 April 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/738.html
Cite as: [2002] EWCA Civ 738

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 738
No C/2001/2900

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Monday, 22nd April 2002

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON
____________________

BHAMJEE Applicant
- v -
NORWICH UNION GENERAL INSURANCE Respondent

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 190 Fleet Street,
London EC4A 2HD
Tel: 0171 421 4040
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

The Applicant was not represented and did not attend
The Respondent was not represented and did not attend
____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE BUXTON: This is an application for permission to appeal from a judgment of Mr Justice Turner delivered in the Administrative Court. Mr Bhamjee has not filed any skeleton argument (which is his prerogative), nor has he given any indication to the court that he is not able to attend today. The case was listed for 2 o'clock. Mr Bhamjee did not appear then. It was adjourned until now and he has not appeared. In the absence of any explanation, I strike the case out for want of prosecution.

  2. I say by way of footnote that the case was dismissed by Mr Justice Turner in very short order. I can see no argument that Mr Bhamjee could address in any event were he to attend.

    3. Order: Application struck out for want of prosecution

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/738.html