BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Idubo v Secretary Of State For Home Department [2002] EWCA Civ 739 (22 April 2002)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/739.html
Cite as: [2002] EWCA Civ 739

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2002] EWCA Civ 739
No C/2001/2684

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL
THE DECISION TO REFUSE PERMISSION TO
CLAIM FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW AND
A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
Monday, 22nd April 2002

B e f o r e :

LORD JUSTICE BUXTON
____________________

IDUBO Applicant
- v -
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Respondent

____________________

(Computer Aided Transcript of the Palantype Notes of
Smith Bernal Reporting Limited, 190 Fleet Street,
London EC4A 2HD
Tel: 0171 421 4040
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

The Applicant was not represented and did not attend
The Respondent was not represented and did not attend

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. LORD JUSTICE BUXTON: This is an application to appeal from adecision of Mr Justice Moses in the Administrative Court on 28th November 2001 dismissing an application for permission to move for judicial review, that application having previously been dismissed by Sir Richard Tucker on paper on 15th October. In his judgment Mr Justice Moses said:
  2. " ..... no arguable ground has been advanced ..... there is no possible advantage to be gained ..... to allow somebody to argue what appears to me plainly unarguable."
  3. Mr Idubo has not appeared today. He has given no explanation to the court why he is not here, in spite of the fact that the court has been in touch with him recently in an attempt to rectify his bundle which was in a defective state.
  4. In view of his lack of appearance I strike the matter out for want of prosecution, having in mind not only his non-attendance but also the observations made by Mr Justice Moses in the court below.
  5. Order: The application was struck out for want of prosecution


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2002/739.html