BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Decisions >> Chisese v Eze [2016] EWCA Civ 1240 (15 November 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2016/1240.html Cite as: [2016] EWCA Civ 1240 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
CHANCERY DIVISION
(MR ANDREW HOCHHAUSER QC)
Strand London, WC2 |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
VICTOR CHISESE | Claimant/Applicant | |
v | ||
PRINCE ARTHUR EZE | Defendant/Respondent |
____________________
WordWave International Limited Trading as DTI
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
LORD JUSTICE SALES:
"1. The grounds of appeal have no prospect of success. Quite apart from the Limitation Act defence, the judge found on the evidence that there was no binding agreement of the kind alleged between the claimant and the second defendant [Prince Eze]. This was a finding that was fully open to him on the evidence and there is no realistic prospect of this court setting it aside.
2. The allegations of impropriety of the judge have no foundation and ought not to have been made."