BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Administrative Court) Decisions >> Nowak, R (on the application of) v Circuit Court of Swidnica, Poland [2012] EWHC 3035 (Admin) (10 October 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/3035.html
Cite as: [2012] EWHC 3035 (Admin)

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWHC 3035 (Admin)
Case No. CO/7107/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
10 October 2012

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE COLLINS
____________________

Between:
THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF NOWAK Claimant
v
CIRCUIT COURT OF SWIDNICA, POLAND Defendant

____________________

Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of
WordWave International Limited
A Merrill Communications Company
165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)

____________________

Mr Ben Cooper (instructed by Whitelock & Storr) appeared on behalf of the Claimant
Miss Natasha Draycott (instructed by Crown Prosecution Service) appeared on behalf of the Defendant

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT

____________________

Crown Copyright ©

  1. MR JUSTICE COLLINS: This is an appeal under Section 26 of the Extradition Act 2003 against a decision of a district judge ordering return to Poland in order to serve the balance of sentences which had been imposed for illicit trafficking in drugs and participating in a criminal organisation.
  2. In the court below - although originally two issues had been raised based on Sections 20 and 21 of the 2003 Act - the appellant was represented by an experienced solicitor who dealt in extradition matters. Neither of the matters were pursued and so there was no challenge to the extradition.
  3. The appellant appealed and sought in the appeal to raise those two issues. There is of course no evidence which he has available now before this court which was not available to him below if he wished to rely on it, and so in principle the court would normally not permit such evidence to be called now. However counsel who now appears for him - Mr Cooper - has realistically recognised that there is no possibility of a successful outcome in this appeal. I am told that the appellant has been so advised.
  4. In those circumstances the only order that I can make is that this appeal be dismissed.
  5. (To Mr Cooper) You want, presumably, the usual legal aid order?
  6. MR COOPER: Yes.
  7. MR JUSTICE COLLINS: Detailed assessment, which you can have, yes.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/3035.html