BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[New search]
[Printable RTF version]
[Help]
Power Supermarkets Ltd/Town & County Investments plc. [1994] IECA 386 (22nd December, 1994)
Competition
Authority decision of 22 December 1994 relating to a proceeding under Section
4 of the Competition Act, 1991
Notification
No:CA/588/92E - Power Supermarkets Limited/Town and County Investments plc
Decision
No: 386
Introduction
1.
Notification was made by Power Supermarkets Limited on
30
September, l992 with a request for a certificate under Section 4(4) of the
Competition Act, l99l or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition
Authority to issue a certificate, a licence under Section 4(2) in respect of a
lease between Power Supermarkets Limited (Powers) and Town and County
Investments plc (Town and County).
The
Facts
(a)
Subject of the notification
2.
The notification concerns a lease relating to the sale of premises at
67/68 William Street, Limerick between Powers as landlord and Town and County
as tenant.
(b)
The parties involved
3.
Powers trades as a supermarket with outlets throughout the State including
one at Arthurs Quay Shopping Centre in Limerick which is 288 yards from the
William Street premises. Town and County is engaged in property investment and
in the letting of commercial premises.
(c)
The notified arrangements
4.
The notified sale and lease agreement was made on l9 December, l989 to
provide for restrictions and covenants following an agreement for the sale by
way of lease of the property at William Street by Powers to Town and County.
Under the notified agreement, in consideration of the purchase price paid, the
premises are demised to Town and County for a term of 900 years from 25 March,
l989 subject to a small rent. Clause 3 contains the following restricted user
clause
"The
Tenant hereby covenants with the Landlord as the owner of the Supermarket in
the Arthurs Quay Centre in the City of Limerick .....not at any time during the
period of ten years from the lst day of November, l989 to sell or permit or
suffer the sale of groceries, food, foodstuffs or food products in an area
exceeding five hundred square feet in the demised premises and not to make any
subletting or grant any licence to use or part with or share the possession of
the said demised premises or any part thereof save on the basis that any such
subtenant licensee or possessor shall first covenant under seal with the
Landlord in manner similar to this ..."
In
addition, there are a number of other standard restrictive covenants and
obligations in the lease.
Assessment
- The Applicability of Section 4(1)
(a)
Section 4(1)
5.
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act 1991 prohibits and renders void all
agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and
concerted practices which have as their object or effect the prevention,
restriction or distortion of competition in trade in any goods or services in
the State, or in any part of the State.
(b)
The Undertakings.
6.
Section 3(1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as "a person being
an individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons engaged
for gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the provision of
a service".
7.
Powers is engaged in the business of supermarket at a large number of outlets
throughout the State and is an undertaking. Town and County is engaged in the
investment in and letting of property for gain and is therefore an undertaking.
The notified lease agreement is an agreement between undertakings. The
agreement has effect within the State.
8.
As the sale of the premise was completed prior to 1 October 1991, the date the
Competition Act came into force, that element of the agreement was discharged
by performance before
the Act came into force. The property that was the
subject of the agreement has been transferred. In the Authority's view, the
prohibition under
Section 4(1) only applies to a current or continuing
contractual commitment or one entered into subsequent to the coming into force
of
the Act. In any event the Authority would not consider the sale, per se, of
a property as raising any issues under the
Competition Act.
9.
The sale agreement contains a continuing contractual commitment on the part
of Town and County, as tenant, in that it has covenanted for a period of 10
years not to sell or permit the sale of groceries, food, foodstuffs or food
products in an area exceeding 500 square feet in the premises demised nor to
let any part without obtaining a similar covenant on the part of the tenant.
The restriction does not extend to restaurant or fast food sales.
10.
The Authority does not consider that the restrictive user clause in the
notified agreement, which applies to the use of the William Street premises,
could be regarded as preventing, restricting or distorting competition within
the State or in any part of the State. Both Dunnes Stores and Roches have
supermarkets in the near locality. In addition, because Limerick City is
relatively small there are several suburban shopping centres with supermarkets
within a few minutes drive. The purchasers acquired the property for their
particular purposes in the knowledge of the restrictive covenant applying to
the premises. If the purchasers wished to acquire properties which could be
used for the sale of groceries, food etc in an area exceeding 500 square feet,
they were free to do so elsewhere in Limerick City or its environs, subject to
the grant of planning permission. Similarly any other undertaking, wishing to
compete with either the vendor (whose nearest place of business is 288 yards
away) or with the purchaser, is not restricted by the agreement from doing so
in the vicinity or elsewhere . The Authority believes however that where it is
not feasible for competitors to obtain alternative premises to those affected
by restrictive user clauses, the position would be rather different, and that
in those circumstances such restrictions could have the effect of restricting
competition. The Authority therefore considers that the notified agreement
between Power Supermarkets Ltd and Town and County Investments plc does not
offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
11.
The Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the agreement between Power Supermarkets Limited and Town
and County Investments plc in relation to the lease of the premises at 67/8
William St, Limerick, notified under
Section 7 on 30 September 1992
(notification no. CA/588/92E), does not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, l99l.
For
the Competition Authority
Des
Wall
Member
22
December 1994
© 1994 Irish Competition Authority
BAILII:
Copyright Policy |
Disclaimers |
Privacy Policy |
Feedback |
Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1994/386.html