BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Jersey Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Representation of McCammon [2008] JRC 221 (12 December 2008) URL: http://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/2008/2008_221.html Cite as: [2008] JRC 221 |
[New search] [Help]
[2008]JRC221
royal court
(Samedi Division)
12th December 2008
Before : |
F. C. Hamon, O.B.E., Commissioner, and Jurats Tibbo and Le Cornu. |
IN THE MATTER OF THE WILL OF IMMOVABLE ESTATE OF GWYNNETH LINDA SPARKE HUELIN, NEE DAVIES
AND IN THE MATTER OF A REPRESENTATION OF ANTONY LEWIS TISDALL McCAMMON.
Advocate C. G. Parslow for the Representor.
judgment
the commissioner:
1. The Court has before it the representation of Antony Lewis Tisdall McCammon, one of the two sons of the late Gwynneth Huelin by her first marriage. The Testator made a Will with four Codicils; only the provisions of clause two of her will dated 25th October, 1988, affects this issue. The other devisee named in the will, James McCammon, is not affected in any way and we have a letter signed by him on 11th December, to that effect. Rupert McCammon is the son of David McCammon the brother of Antony. Now we are asked to alter the will so that the devisee gives various properties under clause 2. of the will of Real Estate but instead of going to Antony they shall go to Le Ponterrin Limited. Article 25 of the Probate (Jersey) Law 1998 reads:-
2. Now that is a statutory provision but the provisions of the Loi (1851) sur les Testaments d'Immeubles is silent on this point. While we are satisfied and we are grateful to the representor that there is no breach of the Housing nor the Statutory Fees Laws, and while this Court can always rectify a will, we cannot without statutory authority re-write a will and it is for that reasons that we have to refuse the application.