BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Maxton v Maxton. [1569] Mor 16518 (10 February 1569)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1569/Mor3816518-002.html Cite as:
[1569] Mor 16518
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Although when a man alienates lands to be holden of himself, he needs no new sasine after redemption, because he remains in the radical right; yet if the alienated lands be holden of the reverser's superior, the Lords have found, That he must be again infeft upon redemption, except the same be taken holden of the superior by comprising; because in that case the proprietor redeeming within seven years, needs no new sasine, the law presuming him to have remained still seised when he redeems within the legal.
Maitland MS.
*** This case is No. 1. p. 11335. voce Presumption.
