BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lockhart v Lady Polmaise. [1582] Mor 6833 (00 November 1582) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1582/Mor1606833-001.html Cite as: [1582] Mor 6833 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1582] Mor 6833
Subject_1 INDIVISIBLE.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Decrees Arbitral.
Lockhart
v.
Lady Polmaise
1582 .November —
Case No.No 1.
A decree arbitral being ultra vires compromissi, cannot be registered, even with respect to that part of it which is within the submission.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was one, named Lockhart, that desired a decreet-arbitral, given betwixt him and the Lady Polmaise, to be registered. It was alleged by the Lady, That the said decreet was ultra vires compromissi, et ideo ought not to be registered, because it bore and expressed the consent of the Laird of Polmaise, who had neither subscribed the same, nor has nothing ado anent the compromit. To the whilk was answered, That, in so far as concerned the Lady, it ought to be registered, because she had both compromitted, subscribed, and homologated the same, et utile per inutile non vitiatur. To this was answered, Quoad regula illa juris utile per inutile, &c. non habet locum nbi legis authoritas, vel natura rei, vel voluntas contrahentium impedimenta sunt, et in hisce casibus utile per inutile vitiatur et corrumpitur. L. 1. § 18. D. De Aqua quotidiana; et manifeste et clare L. 8. §. 7. D. De Fidejussoribus; and so the law being manifest and plain, against the said decree that was given ultra vires compromissi, prout in L. 32. § 15. D. De receptis qui arbitrium, &c.; and so the Judge having decerned, and given forth his decreet ultra vires compromissi, reddebat illum suspectum The Lords, after long reasoning among themselves, found that the decree ought not to be registered, licet bona pars Dominorum in contraria fuerunt opinione.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting