BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Coluthie v Fingask. [1591] Mor 3418 (00 August 1591) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1591/Mor0803418-006.html Cite as: [1591] Mor 3418 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1591] Mor 3418
Subject_1 DECLINATOR.
Coluthie
v.
Fingask
1591 .August .
Case No.No 6.
Some of the Lords of Session being chosen arbiters in a cause, may nevertheless sit and vote with the other Lords, in the execution of the decree-arbitral.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was a submission of certain debates and quarrels betwixt the Laird of Coluthie, on the ane pairt, and the Baron of Fingask, who made a certain number of the Lords of Session, viz. three to every partie, and in case of variance, the chancellor to be oddsman and oersman.—The decreet being given be the chancellor, because the Judges arbiters could not agree, thereafter Coluthie socht the decreet to be registrate. It was opponit againes the registration, That all the persons who wer chosen to be arbitrators, could not be Judges, but aught to be removit, as they who had given partial counsall, as was practised sundrie tymes of before. It was answerit, That albeit there was certain number of the ordinar Judges of the Session that were chosen arbitri aut arbitratores obligantibus; yet now when the registration and execution of the thing was decernit, the self same persones might be Judges quia aliud est arbitrium, aliud judicium; for utherwise the decreet arbitral sould skairsely take effect, for such a great number of Lords being declynit, there would not rest behind to make furth the ordinar number. The Lords repellit the declinator, and fand the decreet arbitral sould be registrate.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting