BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Robert Fortoun v Shewan. [1610] Mor 4429 (19 January 1610)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1104429-001.html
Cite as: [1610] Mor 4429

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1610] Mor 4429      

Subject_1 FOREIGN.
Subject_2 DIVISION. I.

Foreign Writs, formal according to the Law of the place, afford action in Scotland, as obligatory jure gentium.
Subject_3 SECT. I.

Bonds without witnesses.

Robert Fortoun
v.
Shewan

Date: 19 January 1610
Case No. No 1.

A bond granted in another country, formal according to the law of the place, was sustained to found an action in Scotland, though wanting witnesses.


Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

Robert fortoun, procurator constitute by Keysars in Middleburgh, to a bond of L. 100 Flemish, made to the said Keysars by John Shewan burgess of Dundee;—it was alleged, That the bond was null, because it wanted witnesses.—The pursuer replied, That it was sufficient, being made in Middleburgh to a stranger, according to the custom observed there betwixt merchant and merchant; which answer the Lords found relevant.—It was further alleged, That the summons was not relevant, concluding payment of annualrent for the said sum, seeing the bond bore no such promise.—It was answered, That the defender, by his missive letter, which was written and subscribed by his hand, had excused him to the pursuer's cedent for his delay of payment of the debt owing to him, and had promised by his said letter to recompense his loss for the want thereof; which reply the Lords also found relevant, and thought that the recompense of his loss could be no less than his annualrent, a ten for the hundred.

Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 316. Haddington, MS. No 1746.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1610/Mor1104429-001.html