BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Home v Home. [1612] Mor 9627 (16 June 1612) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1612/Mor2309627-002.html Cite as: [1612] Mor 9627 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1612] Mor 9627
Subject_1 PART and PERTINENT.
Date: Home
v.
Home
16 June 1612
Case No.No 2.
A fortalice requires express infeftment; but a manor-place requires no express infeftment.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A party being infeft in lands may charge the possessor to deliver to him the manor-place, being built upon the said lands, albeit he be not infeft per expressum, if the house be built upon the land, and have that same denomination, and have been peaceably possessed by the pursuers's predecessors.—A fortalice requires express infeftment, but a manor-place requires no express infeftment; and yet the heritor may charge summarily for delivery of the manor-place after the liferenter's decease, without any warning.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting