BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
E. of Kinghorn v L. of Inchstuir. [1622] Mor 6715 (26 February 1622)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1622/Mor1606715-139.html Cite as:
[1622] Mor 6715
Title to Exclude. - When Proponable. - What Title Sufficient. - What the Effect.
E of Kinghorn v. L of Inchstuir.
Date: 26 February 1622 Case No. No 139.
After the defender has made a production sufficient to exclude the pursuer, the pursuer is at liberty to produce older titles, cum processu, upon which he may crave certification, unless again excluded by a new production.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action of improbation pursued by the E. of Kinghorn, as heritably infeft in the lands of Inchstuir, against the L. of Inchstuir, for improbation of the evidents made to him, or any of his predecessors, the defender compearing, produced a right anterior to the right which the pursuer produced for his title in that process, and alleged, That he could not be compelled to produce any more, seeing thereby he elided the pursuer's right; which being found sufficient by the Lords;—The pursuer replied, That his predecessors, to whom he succeeded, had anterior rights before the defender's right produced, and condescended upon the eldest right, which any of his predecessors had of these lands; which the Lords sustained by way of reply to be proved, albeit it was not instantly produced; and found, that the pursuer needed not to produce his eldest right instantly, but that it might be instantly proved cum processu, and that the defender should not be urged to produce until it were proved; but being proved, they found that the defender should produce all other writs made to his predecessors of these lands, or else a right made to them anterior to that eldest right condescended on, and offered to be proved by the pursuer's reply.
Act. Hope.Alt. Nicolson.Clerk, Gibson.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 451. Durie, p. 18.*** Haddington reports this case.
In the improbation pursued mutually by the Earl of Kinghorn and Laird of Inchstuir, it was alleged by Inchstuir, That he could not be held to produce any older infeftment of his lands held of the King, than the sasine produced by the Earl, pursuer, which was his title libelled, because the defender was infeft upon a retour as heir to his father in his lands held of the King, long before the sasine produced. The pursuer replied, That his right proceeded from his forebears, who were lawfully infeft holden of the King in the days of King Robert the Second; which reply was found relevant, albeit he had not so libelled, and declared that ratification should be granted of all Inchstuir's posterior infeftments that should not be produced.
