BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Cassimbro v Irvine. [1624] Mor 13233 (11 February 1624)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1624/Mor3113233-046.html Cite as:
[1624] Mor 13233
No exception will be sustained unless proponed at Litiscontestation.
Cassimbro v. Irvine
Date: 11 February 1624 Case No. No 46.
Where the deed is not holograph, the defender is not bound to depone simpliciter upon the verity of the subscription. He may either plead, that it is not relevant to refer the verity of the subscription to his oath, or he may retain liberty to depone as if resting owing were referred.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
One Cassimbro, a Fleming, pursues Captain Irvine for payment L. 500 Flemish, conform to his bond granted to him thereupon in anno 1624; and whereupon pursuit was intented, in anno 1631, which, sinsyne lying over, was now again wakened; wherein the defender alleging, The bond was null, because it wanted witnesses insert therein; and the pursuer answering, That this allegeance ought not to be received against a bond made out of Scotland, and granted in favours of a stranger, remaining in the Low-Countries, where such bonds are valid, albeit wanting witnesses; likeas he offered and referred to the Captain's oath, the verity of the subscription, to be his proper hand-writ, and also that he was debtor of the sum the time when he subscribed the bond; and the defender replied, That that was not enough, unles she referred also to his oath, that the sum was still resting owing unpaid;—the Lords found, That they would not supply this nullity alleged against the bond, viz. of wanting witnesses, except that as the pursuer referred the verity of the subscription and truth of the debt at the time of the making of the bond to his oath, so also that he referred, and that the defender should also therewith depone by the same oath, if the sum was yet resting unpaid or not; and found that the defender ought not to be compelled to depone upon the one, without consideration of his declaration, which he was found he ought and might declare upon the other, viz. if it was yet resting owing unpaid; in respect that the libel bears that he was debtor by his bond in the sum therein contained, and that it was yet resting owing unpaid, so that he ought to swear upon the whole libel conjunctly, and not divide the same, in respect of the alleged nullity of the bond; and this was also found, albeit the bond was made in Flanders, and to a Fleming, and not betwixt Scotsmen.
Act. Mowat.Alt. Nicolson.Clerk, Gibson.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 300. Durie, p. 702.
