BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
E. Cassils v Simpson. [1626] Mor 3452 (18 March 1626)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1626/Mor0803452-003.html Cite as:
[1626] Mor 3452
A nobleman left his Parliament robes with his tailor in a trunk. To render the tailor liable, it was found necessary to prove, that the key of the trunk had been given to him, and that he undertook the custody.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Cassils, as heir to the deceast Master of Cassils, his uncle, pursues George Simpson tailor in Edinburgh, for delivery to him, as heir to the said umquhile Earl, of his Parliament robe, which was within a trunk, and which trunk, having the said robe within the same, was put by the said umquhile Earl's servant, at his command, in the said George's dwelling-house, and was committed to the said George's custody and keeping. This summons was not found relevant, seeing it was not therein libelled, that the key of the trunk, where the said robe lay, was delivered to the defender, and that he took upon him the custody thereof, and to be answerable therefor; without the which had been specially libelled, the Lords found, that the defender could not be convened, nor be found answerable therefor, albeit the summons bore, that the same was put in his house, and expressly was committed to his custody and keeping. For the Lords found, that such persons, as was this defender, being common servants to noblemen, as this excipient, who was his tailor, ought not to be answerable for coffers and trunks, and boxes with writs, and such other wares, pertaining to noblemen, which their servants would set in within the dwelling-house of their merchants, or tailors, at the noblemens' coming, or being in Edinburgh; for they would take the same out, and put the same in again, at their own pleasure, as they had occasion to use the same, without the knowledge of the owner of the house, so that it, were great iniquity to burden the master of the house with the same thereafter, except that it could be proven, and that it were libelled, that they had meddled with the same, and done any deed prejudicial to the owners therein.
Act. ——et Nicolson.Alt. Mowat.Clerk, Scot.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 234. Durie, p. 193.
