BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Roxburgh v Ker of Cavers. [1627] 1 Brn 140 (12 February 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Brn010140-0303.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION reported by SIR ROBERT SPOTISWOODE OF PENTLAND.
Subject_2 Such of the following Decision as are of a Date prior to about the year 1620, must have been taken by Spotiswoode from some of the more early Reporters. The Cases which immediately follow have no Date affixed to them by Spotiswoode.
Date: The Earl of Roxburgh
v.
Ker of Cavers
12 February 1627 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was a question agitated among the Lords, ament the acknowledgment due to the superior of adjudged lands; for Ker of Cavers, having some lands adjudged to him by decreet of the Lords, charged the Earl of Roxburgh, superior of them, to infeft him thereintill. He suspended, alleging, that he was not obliged to infeft him while he got one year's duty of the lands, as in comprisings. Many were of opinion, that the Act of Parliament, ordaining one year's duty to be due to the superior in comprisings, should not be extended to adjudications, which would prove very prejudicial to creditors; and that they, coming in the place of the heir who refused to enter, could be restricted to pay no more than he would have done for entering of himself: others thought, that there was identitas rationis in both, and that there was no law to urge a superior to receive a stranger without a year's duty. But the question was not decided, because the charger offered to come in my Lord's own will.
Page 9.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting