BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Earl of Cassillis v His Tenants. [1627] Mor 11609 (8 February 1627) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1627/Mor2711609-275.html Cite as: [1627] Mor 11609 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1627] Mor 11609
Subject_1 PRESUMPTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION. X Mandate when presumed.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Rent being paid to a Factor, whether the Landlord's consent is presumed, so as to infer his passing from Irritancies, &c.
Date: Earl of Cassillis
v.
His Tenants
8 February 1627
Case No.No 275.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a removing of the Earl of Cassillis against his Tenants, alleged by them, That since the warning, they had made payment of some customs and services to the Earl's factors and chamberlains, which were applied to his use. Found not relevant, unless it had been by his knowledge, command, or allowance.
Sicklike in a spuilzie of teinds, payment of any part of them at direction of the chamberlain, not relevant to purge the spuilzie, inhibition once being served.
*** A similar decision was pronounced 5th March 1629, Lord Lee against Kirkwood, No 26. p. 7195, voce Irritancy.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting