BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
L. Haddo v L. Ludquharn. [1629] Mor 16252 (23 July 1629)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1629/Mor3716252-109.html
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
A pursuit for delivery of evidents was sustained at the minor's instance, before his majority, against one of his curators, who was chosen sine quo non, without concourse of any of the rest of the curators to assist the pursuit, being authorized by two advocates, whom he then instantly chose curators at the Bar ad hanc litem, which was sustained, he having other curators, who were not removed, nor any of them concurring in the pursuit with him; but the same was sustained, first only for exhibition of writs; and, after exhibition, the Lords declared they would advise what would be done anent the delivery.
Act. Nicolson.Alt. Stuart.Clerk, Gibson.
Durie, p. 466.
