BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Earl of Annandale v David Rodger, Minister of St Mungo's. [1630] 1 Brn 306 (15 February 1630) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Brn010306-0801.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR GEORGE AUCHINLECK OF BALMANNO.
Date: The Earl of Annandale
v.
David Rodger, Minister of St Mungo's
15 February 1630 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Earl of Annandale pursues removing against Mr David Rodger, minister
and parson at St Mungo's kirk, in Annandale, from six acres of land, which are alleged to be dyked in by the said minister, of the said Earl's lands of——, lying next adjacent to the said minister's designed glebe of four acres of land. It was excepted by the minister, That he could not be decerned to remove from the said lands, because he is lawfully provided to the parsonage of the said kirk, and, by virtue of his provision, had been in peaceable possession of the said lands controverted, by the space of seven years. To the which it was replied, That this exception was not relevant upon the possession of seven years, except he would allege that the said lands had been bruiked by the parsons of the said kirk before the Reformation. The Lords repelled the exception founded upon seven years' possession. And then it was duplied by the defender, That he offers him to prove that he had bruiked the said lands by the space of twenty years, and that the said lands were holden and repute kirk-lands pertaining to the parson of the said kirk. Which duply was found relevant. Page 84.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting