BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Crichton v Robert Maitland. [1630] Mor 12360 (26 January 1630) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1630/Mor2912360-143.html Cite as: [1630] Mor 12360 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1630] Mor 12360
Subject_1 PROOF.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Allegeances how relevant to be proved.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. Payment and Consignation how relevant to be proved.
Date: John Crichton
v.
Robert Maitland
26 January 1630
Case No.No 143.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In an action of poinding of the ground for an annualrent of ten merks, owing many years, pursued by John Crichton against Robert Maitland of Eccles, the defender having proponed an exception of payment for the years libelled, the Lords found, That as the annual was constituted by writ, so it should be taken away that same way, by discharges only, and not by witnesses.
1632. July 4.—The same was found between John Dalrymple of Waterside and the Laird of Closeburn, that an annualrent of a certain sum extending but to L. 44 or thereby yearly, for the space of nine or ten years, which was alleged to be paid, could only be taken away by writ or oath of party, although it was but a mean sum.
*** Durie's report of this last case is No 174. p. 9856. voce Passive Title.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting