BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Chisholm v Stevenson. [1668] Mor 246 (18 December 1668) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1668/Mor0100246-019.html Cite as: [1668] Mor 246 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1668] Mor 246
Subject_1 ADJUDICATION and APPRISING.
Subject_2 RANKING of ADJUDGERS and APPRISERS.
Date: Chisholm
v.
Stevenson
18 December 1668
Case No.No 19.
What expenees a second appriser liable to pay to a first.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Chisholm, a second compriser, and admitted to come in pari passu with Stevenson, who was the first compriser, he paying his proportional part of the whole charges waired out, conform to the late act of Parliament, anent Debtor and Creditor: The Lords found, that he should only be liable for his part of such charges as were disbursed for deducing the apprising, and obtaining infeftment thereon, and obtaining decreets of removing, or for mails and duties; which they ordained to be communicated to the second compriser, but did not find him liable for the expences of the registration of the bond, and raising of letters of horning and inhibition and execution thereof.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting