BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
The Town of Hamilton v Robert Hendersone. [1678] 3 Brn 216 (12 January 1678)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Brn030216-0280.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
The Town of Hamilton v. Robert Hendersone
Date: 12 January 1678
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In the mutual reductions and declarator between the Town of Hamilton and Robert Hendersone,
1mo, Offered to prove, by the writer's witnesses and trysters, that the sum was blank at the subscribing; which being granted, then by the parties in whose hands the writs were depositate and consigned, that they were not to be filled up nor delivered, till a count had preceded between them.
Answered 1mo,—His bond cannot be taken away but only scripto vel juramento. 2do, He will yet instruct he was either debtor to him, or bound to relieve him, for as much as the sum filled up in the bond; and that before the filling up of it.
Replied,—These debts must be before the inhibition served against the common debtor, by the Town of Hamilton, else they cannot be allowed.
Duplied,—The inhibition is null; because it does not bear a publication at. the market-cross where he then staid, viz. Rutherglen, within which prison he then was. See Lanfrancus Balbus, Decisione 494.
Triplied,—They needed not but at the place where he had domicilium, (for in prison he had it not, that being mala mansio et involuntaria,) viz. at Hamilton, where his wife and bairns dwelt, the inhibition was published.
Newton found it a sufficient publication that was made at the market-cross of the principal burgh of the shire or regality where he had focum et larem; the inhibiter proving always, that Nasmith, before he was carried prisoner to Paisley, had his ordinary residence within the regality of Hamilton. And as to the first, ordained Hendersone (for though, pendente lite, it was assigned to and it judicially produced, and the rest of the acts of the process carried on in the assignee's name, yet it was declared that assignation should not prejudge us of any defence competent against the cedent, nor of his oath,) to depone if the bond was blank and depositate; and, in case he confess this, then ordains the depositary, witnesses, and fillers up of the sum of the bond, to be examined upon the conditions. See the information of it.
The Lords allowed Hendersone (since the sum was proven to have been filled up without the debtor's knowledge,) yet to instruct the onerous cause, and that Nasmith was his debtor in as much as his half of the bond came to.
