BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
The Duke of Lauderdale v The Earlof Twedale. [1678] 3 Brn 221 (25 January 1678)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1678/Brn030221-0290.html
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
The Duke of Lauderdale v. The Earlof Twedale
1678.
January25and
26.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Thir two days were wholly consumed almost in the Inner-House (yea, they sat till one o'clock, which some affirmed unlawful,) in advising the Duke of Lauderdale's action against the Earl of Twedale, about the teinds of Pinky, within the lordship and regality of Mussleburgh, in which there were three points; one of the tack, another of the heritable disposition, and if it was annexed property, and the third was, if it was prescribed, since, in the English usurpation, the Duke of Lauderdale was nec valens, nec volens, nec potens agere. Of this see more alibi in thir collections.
