BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kelso v M'Cuby of Knokdolian. [1686] Mor 6330 (25 Nov 1686) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1686/Mor1506330-004.html Cite as: [1686] Mor 6330 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1686] Mor 6330
Subject_1 IMPLIED CONDITION.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Provision to Children payable at a certain age.
Date: Kelso
v.
M'Cuby of Knokdolian
25 Nov 1686
Case No.No 4.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Fergus M'Cuby having, by his bond, obliged himself to pay 10,000 merks to his nephew by a second brother deceased, at his age of twenty-one years, and to aliment him in the mean time, the creditor left 2000 merks, by way of legacy, to his mother's relations, and died before he was twenty-one years old; and the legators having pursued for payment, it was alleged for the defender, The words, at the age of twenty-one years, are a part of the obligation-clause, and a condition which did not exist; and this sense on it may be the more easily admitted, seeing the bond bears love and favour.
2do, The bond is conceived in favour of the defunct personally, and not to heirs and executors.
Answered, That the clause imports not a conditional obligement, but only a delay of payment; and although the bond bears love and favour, it obliges the creditor to renounce all interest he could claim by the death of his father or grandfather, which makes it onerous. 2do, Assignees not being excluded by any taxative clause, the bond was assignable, and also might be legated.
The Lords found the bond to be pure, and not conditional, and decerned the defender to pay the legacies, the legatars securing him pro tanto against the defunct's nearest of kin, which was the quality of the bond. ——This appears different from former decisions.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting