BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Mercer v Sir William Keith of Ludquhairn. [1694] 4 Brn 156 (16 February 1694) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1694/Brn040156-0359.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL.
Date: Thomas Mercer
v.
Sir William Keith of Ludquhairn
16 February 1694 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords found the dilatory defence, proponed against his title, that he had not used requisition forty days before the term, conform to the tenor of his wadset, was no acknowledgment of the passive titles; and that he might insist on that No process, and yet deny the passive titles: and that his summons, being only for payment, it could not sustain till first he used requisition; but, if it had borne a conclusion to transfer the contract of wadset against Ludquhairn passivè, then they would have granted decreet in these terms without requisition.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting