BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Ainsly of Blackhill v Adam Chisholm. [1696] Mor 12626 (13 February 1696)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor2912626-520.html Cite as:
[1696] Mor 12626
An unsubscribed scroll of a tenanr's account, delivered to him by the factor of an estate, found probative against the landlord.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Phesdo reported Ainsly of Blackhill against Adam Chisholm, Lord Lothian's tenant in his lands of Newton, for payment of two sums contained in a bond and a bill or precept. The defence was, by a fitted account, under your father's hand (who was chamberlain) these debts are all stated and paid. Alleged, It is but an unsubscribed scroll, which has been only made up for memory's sake, and is liable to several errors and corrections, and so not probative. The Lords thought if this scroll had been in the chamberlain's hands, there might have been some ground of cavil; but being delivered by him to the tenant, and all written with his own hand, the rusticity of labourers on the one side, and the nimbleness of chamberlains on the other, pleaded it should be sufficient to exoner, though it was not so authentic as a merchant's count-book exactly kept. Some urged, that, beside the proving its being holograph, the tenant should also be burdened to instruct that was his way of counting, by giving them unsubscribed scrolls of their accounts; but this was not required, the Lords proceeding more upon material justice in this case than strict law, according to Constantinus' rule in 1. 8. C. De judiciis, Placuit in omnibus causis præcipuam esse justitiæ æquitatisque quam stricti juris rationem.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 261. Fountainhall, v. 1. p. 711.
