BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Anderson v Forbes. [1696] Mor 15344 (17 January 1696)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1696/Mor3515344-240.html Cite as:
[1696] Mor 15344
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Where an inhibition of teind was only, in general, against all and sundry, but neither executed personally, nor at any man's dwelling-house, the Lords refused to sustain the same to interrupt bona fide possession, in consequence of a right to the teinds in question, obtained a non domino, or to make the party a mala fide possessor; though it may be sufficient to interrupt tacit relocation.
Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 429. Fountainhall.
*** This case is No. 19. p. 10630. voce Possessory Judgment.
