BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Baillie v Duke of Douglas. [1730] Mor 15738 (2 December 1730)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1730/Mor3615738-135.html
Cite as: [1730] Mor 15738

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1730] Mor 15738      

Subject_1 TEINDS.
Subject_2 SECT. IV.

Valuation.

Baillie
v.
Duke of Douglas

Date: 2 December 1730
Case No. No. 135.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In an action of Valuation of teind at the heritors' instance against the patron, it was insisted on for the patron, That the heritor having got a considerable grassum for a nine years tack of his lands, the ninth part of that grassum ought to be added to the yearly rent, in order to make out a valuation of the teind; but it was found, That in respect the old rent was kept tip, and that grassums were not in use to be paid formerly for tacks of the pursuer's lands, therefore the grassum could not be taken into the calculation in ascertaining the valuation of the teinds.

In the same process the patron likewise insisted, That here the tenants, by their tacks, being taken bound to pay annually the half of the land-tax, this payment ought likewise to be considered as increasing the value of the teind, since the fifth part of the gross rent, without deduction of public burdens, is the rule, by act of Parliament, for valueing tithes. To this it was opposed, That the quantity of land-tax is uncertain, its endurance not absolutely certain, and therefore it has been the practice of the Court not to augment the teind rental on account of the tenants paying the half or the whole of it. The Lords like wise repelled this allegeance.—See Appendix.

Fol. Dic. v. 2. p. 440.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1730/Mor3615738-135.html