BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Freeholders of Dumfries-shire v Fergusson of Craigdarroch. [1746] Mor 8755 (30 July 1746) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1746/Mor218755-136.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 MEMBER of PARLIAMENT.
Subject_2 DIVISION IV. Decisions common to qualifications upon the old extent and valuation.
Subject_3 SECT. III. Nominal and Fictitious.
Date: Freeholders of Dumfries-shire
v.
Fergusson of Craigdarroch
30 July 1746
Case No.No 136.
A superior, although he had granted a perpetual discharge of the feu-duty, found entitled to vote.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Fergusson of Craigdarroch stood on the roll of freeholders of Dumfries, as being superior of the two-and-a-half merk land of Dunreggan.
Objected, That William Fergusson of Craigdarroch had, anno 1627, disponed these lands, to be held of himself feu for 16 merks Scots, for which feu-duty he, at the same time, granted a perpetual discharge, obliging himself to grant termly discharges as it fell due, if needful; so that he was only nominally superior.
Answered, That he retained still right to the other casualties of superiority. Observed on the Bench, That this right could not be at that time created fictitiously to give a vote, but the intent was plain; the lands holding ward, could not be feued out, but at a competent avail; and, therefore, to salve this, a discharge was granted of the feu-duty contained in the charter.
The Lords repelled the objection.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting