BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> John Campbell v Colonel Halkett. [1747] 2 Elchies 461 (21 July 1747) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1747/Elchies020461-029.html Cite as: [1747] 2 Elchies 461 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1747] 2 Elchies 461
Subject_1 PRESCRIPTION.
Date: John Campbell
v.
Colonel Halkett
21 July 1747
Case No.No. 29.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Earl of Breadalbane, in 1688, got the Council's recommendation to the Treasury for L.300 sterling, and in 1693 he gave it to Sir Patrick Murray, Receiver-General, on his holograph obligement, to pay the money if it should be allowed to him in his accounts in 1696. It was allowed, and in 1736, when the 40 years prescription was almost run, John Campbell, Cashier to the Royal Bank, as assignee by the Earl, pursued Colonel Peter Halkett, as representing Sir Patrick Murray, for the money. Minto first sustained the 20 years prescription, and 14th January 1747, we adhered. But afterwards, 19th February, we altered, and found the obligement probative of the facts therein contained; for the majority then thought that the holograph obligement was not the ground of action, but Sir Patrick's account in Exchequer, and that the obligement was no more than a declaration of the trust. But thereafter we altered a second time. We did
not adhere to our interlocutor, 14th January, but took the whole circumstances of the case under consideration, and found that no action lay ort that obligement, 9th June 1747.— Adhered, 21st July.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting