BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Crombie v Duguid. [1749] Mor 10162 (7 December 1749)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1749/Mor2410162-022.html Cite as:
[1749] Mor 10162
In what cases a denunciation bars a defendendo as well as ab agendo.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Elspeth Crombie pursued Patrick Duguid of Auchinhove in a spuilzie, and when compearance was made for him, she opposed his being allowed to defend, in respect he stood fugitate by sentence of the Lords of Justiciary at the Circuit Court held at Aberdeen in spring 1749.
Accordingly the Lords ‘found that he was debarred a defendendo, not having personam standi;’ and this agreeable to the established practice, which never permits rebels to compear or have the privilege of subjects, except in the case where the process requires the personal presence of the defender; such as, where the libel is offered to be proved by the defender's oath, or where he takes a day to produce a progress, or the like. And a petition was refused, praying an alteration in respect he was not yet denounced on the sentence of fugitation.
But nevertheless, a proof of the facts was still necessary, which were not to be taken for truth, upon the pursuer's averment.
Kilkerran, (Persona Standi.) No 1. p. 402.
*** See D. Falconer's report of this case No 81. p. 4775. voce Forfieture.
