BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Duke of Roxburgh v Chatto. [1753] 1 Elchies 513 (16 February 1753) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1753/Elchies010513-035.html |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 WITNESS.
The Duke of Roxburgh
v.
Chatto
1753 ,Feb. 16 .
Case No.No. 35.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In this trial of forgery, mentioned supra February 6, (No. 30, voce Fraud) Mr Walter Pringle, Advocate, was adduced for the pursuer, and being interrogated, Whether the prisoner had showed him the writing quarrelled, what the tenor or purport and date of it were, and what conversation he had with Mr Robert Pringle, one of the Duke's lawyers, concerning it? Objected, that he was employed as counsel for the prisoner, and therefore could not be obliged to reveal any of his client's secrets. The Lords found him obliged to depone, Whether he had seen the writing, and what he remembered of the tenor and date of it, and what conversation he had with Mr Robert Pringle, but would not ask him from whom he got the paper, nor any thing that his client said to him about it? which was agreeable to the precedent, 21st December 1675, Creditors of Wamphray against Lord Wamphray, (Dict. No. 12. p. 347.)
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
