BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Thomas Paton v John Macintosh. [1757] Mor 13806 (15 December 1757)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1757/Mor3213806-038.html
Cite as: [1757] Mor 13806

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

[1757] Mor 13806      
Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. I.

Who entitled to pursue a Removing.

Thomas Paton
 v.
John Macintosh

Date: 15 December 1757
Case No. No 38.

Found that an apparent heir cannot remove tenants.

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

The Sheriff of Angus having decerned in a removing at the instance of John M'Intosh, an apparent heir, against Thomas Paton; Paton suspended on this ground, that an apparent heir could not sue in a removing; and quoted a case; Robert Boyd of Penkill against M'Garva, which had been the subject of Lord Chesterhall's report, when upon his trials, in which the Court had unanimously found so. The Lords suspended the letters.

 For Charger, Mackintosh. For Suspender, J. Dalrymple. Fac. Col. No 69. p. 118.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1757/Mor3213806-038.html