BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Commissary of Aberdeen v Commissaries of Edinburgh. [1763] Mor 7552 (18 February 1763)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1763/Mor1807552-271.html Cite as:
[1763] Mor 7552
Of Superior and Inferior Commissaries and their Privileges.
Commissary of Aberdeen v. Commissaries of Edinburgh
Date: 18 February 1763 Case No. No 271.
The Commissaries of Edinburgh have no power to advocate causes from inferior Commissaries.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a process of scandal and verbal injury, the Commissary of Aberdeen pronounced an interlocutory sentence, “decerning the defender to appear in the court and to ask pardon of the pursuer, &c. and decerning him to pay a certain sum for damages and expenses.” The defender, dissatisfied with this sentence, presented a petition of appeal to the Commissaries of Edinburgh, praying, “That the said interlocutor be reversed, and such other relief and indemnification be given him as to them shall seem meet.” The Commissaries of Edinburgh granted a deliverance upon this petition of appeal, “Appointing the same to be intimated to the pursuer, or to his procurator at Aberdeen; and appointing the pursuer to give in answers within twelve days after the intimation.” And having thereafter resumed the consideration of the appeal, they gave the following deliverance:
“The Commissaries having considered the petition of appeal, with their interlocutor thereon, duly intimated, to which no answer has been given, they remit the cause to the Commissary of Aberdeen with the following instruction, that he yet allow a reasonable time to the defender for begging pardon of the pursuer, &c.”
The Commissary of Aberdeen, being advised that the Commissaries of Edinburgh have no power to take causes from his court, whether by advocation or appeal, advocated this cause to the Court of Session, upon the single head of incompetency. And the bill of advocation being reported to the Court, they appointed excerpts of the statutes and instructions concerning the jurisdiction of the Commissaries of Edinburgh to be laid before them, which being done, the following considerations occurred to the Judges at advising; the form of an appeal is contained in act 99. Parliament 1503, binding the appellant to find caution in the inferior court within a time specified. This form gave place to advocations which did not require such caution. And Stair bears testimony that appeals went out of use after the institution of the Court of Session, giving place to advocations, reductions, and suspensions. With respect to advocations in particular, Stair says that they were confined to the Court of Session, L. 4. tit. 1. § 35. And § 36, he says, “That the Lords do advocate from the Commissaries, and that the Commissaries of Edinburgh may reduce the decreets of inferior Commissaries;” which is agreeable to the act 1609, establishing the Commissaries of Edinburgh.
And as for appeals, it appears from the 19th article of the instructions to the Commissaries, that these were at that time in desuetude; and that the Commissaries of Edinburgh could not review the proceedings of inferior commissaries, otherwise than by a libelled summons of reduction.
“And accordingly it was found, That the Commissaries of Edinburgh have no power to advocate from inferior Commissaries.”
