BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ogilvie v Ross and Wood. [1771] Mor 10099 (00 February 1771) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1771/Mor2410099-033.html Cite as: [1771] Mor 10099 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1771] Mor 10099
Subject_1 PERICULUM.
Subject_2 SECT. III. Periculum between Mandant and Mandatary. - Postmaster, whether answerable for Money sent by Post.
Ogilvie
v.
Ross and Wood
1771 .February .
Case No.No 33.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Ogilvie at London, sent a cask of apples to his brother at Edinburgh, directed to William Ogilvie, Esq; by the ship Adolphus, Ross master. Ross, who brought the apples safe to Leith, could not find, from the vague direction of Esquire, where to send them, but allowed Wood, a factor in Leith, to take them into his custody, where they remained some months till they were spoiled; after which Ogilvie discovered them, and pursued both Ross and Wood for their value.—The Lords at first found Wood liable; but, on review, when it appeared that the loss was owing to Ogilvie at London not sending a bill of lading, and that Ogilvie at Edinburgh had not made sufficient timeous enquiry about the parcel, the Court altered and assoilzied. See Appendix.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting