BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Katharine Wallace and Others, v William Wallace. [1782] Mor 17056 (25 November 1782) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1782/Mor3817056-333.html Cite as: [1782] Mor 17056 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1782] Mor 17056
Subject_1 WRIT.
Subject_2 SECT. XI. Writs defective in Solemnities, Whether capable of Support, so as to furnish Action?
Date: Katharine Wallace and Others,
v.
William Wallace
25 November 1782
Case No.No. 333.
A missive letter, not holograph, containing an obligation of relief, is not a ground of action, though the subscription be judicially acknowledged.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Wallace subscribed an obligatory missive letter, not holograph of himself, by which “he became bound to relieve Katharine Wallace of a cautionary engagement” incurred by her father for a third party. She having brough an action against him on that ground, he judicially acknowledged his subscription; but contended nevertheless, that by its wanting the statutory solemnities, the writing was null.
The cause was advocated from an inferior judge who had assoilzied the defender, when
The Lord Ordinary repelled the reasons of advocation.
The pursuer reclaimed to the Court; but their Lordships refused her petition, without answers.
Lord Ordinary, Braxfield. For the petitioner, G. Buchanan-Hepburn.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting