BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Burnside Kemp Fraser & Ors v Davis [1999] ScotCS 202 (31 August 1999) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1999/202.html Cite as: [1999] ScotCS 202 |
||
[New search] [Help]
|
OUTER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION
|
|
|
CA166/14/97
|
OPINION OF LORD HAMILTON
in the cause
BURNSIDE KEMP FRASER AND OTHERS
Pursuers;
against
DAVID GALE WILLIAM DAVIS
Defender:
________________
|
Pursuers: Smith, Q.C.; Balfour & Manson
Defender: Davidson, Q.C.; Anderson Strathern
31 August 1999
In this action the defender is one of the survivors of the disaster of 14 March 1992. There may be some question as to the nature of his relationship with Mr Kemp or his former firm as at and prior to September 1994 but that issue cannot be satisfactorily determined without inquiry. Insofar as concerns the relevancy of the pursuers' pleadings on the merits of the action, the circumstances are otherwise the same as those in Burnside Kemp Fraser v Parker.
Accordingly for the reasons expressed in my Opinions in that case and in Burnside Kemp Fraser v Robb I shall repel the defender's second plea-in-law (forum non conveniens) and, of concession, his first plea-in-law (lis alibi pendens). I shall sustain his third plea-in-law to the extent of excluding from probation the pursuers' averments in article 4 of the condescendence from "All of the Solicitors" to "enter into the foregoing agreement". The case will be put out By Order for discussion of the matters referred to in the final paragraph of my Opinion in Burnside Kemp Fraser v Robb.
