BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Law Commission (Reports)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Law Commission >> Scottish Law Commission (Reports) >> Annual Report 2007 [2008] SLC 211 (Report) (February 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/other/SLC/Report/2008/211.html
Cite as: [2008] SLC 211 (Report)

[New search] [Help]


Scottish Law Commission
promoting law reform

Scottish Law Commission
promoting law reform
Established under the Law Commissions Act 1965
Our function
To recommend reforms to improve, simplify and update the law of Scotland
Our role
To play a leading role in developing the law for the people of Scotland so that
it is just, principled, responsive and easy to understand
annual report I 2007

Professor George Gretton, Professor Gerry Maher, Colin Tyre (seated), Michael Lugton, Lord Drummond Young and Professor Joe Thomson
978 0 10888 217 3

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Scottish Law Commission
promoting law reform
Annual Report 2007
To: Mr Kenny MacAskill MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Justice
We are pleased to submit to the Scottish Ministers our Annual Report for the year to
31 December 2007.
&v^ JAMES DRUMMOND YOUNG, Chairman
GEORGE GRETTON
GERARD MAHER
JOSEPH M THOMSON
COLIN TYRE
Michael Lugton, Chief Executive
6 February 2008
Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers under section 3(3) of the Law
Commissions Act 1965
February 2008
SG/2008/16
EDINBURGH: The Stationery Office
£13.90

Contents
Chairman's foreword                                                                  5
Publications 2007                                                                      7
Law reform projects                                                                   8
Consolidation and statute law repeals                                     24
Promoting law reform                                                              25
Law reform publications planned for 2008                              26
Commissioners and staff                                                         27
Project advisory groups                                                            28
Running costs                                                                          29

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
In November we received a new reference from the
Scottish Government on a range of aspects of
criminal law and procedure; initially we are
considering possible Crown rights of appeal against
judicial rulings that can end a solemn case without a
jury verdict and certain aspects of the rule against
double jeopardy. References from Government form
an important aspect of our work, and we are always
anxious to deal with them expeditiously.
During 2008 we will continue to make progress with
our existing projects. We envisage publication of
reports on our projects on Crown appeals and
damages for wrongful death. We will also start to
develop proposals for our Eighth Programme, which
will operate from 2010 onwards.
We are pleased that the Scottish Government has
stated that it will implement our Report (published
in 2006) on Interest on Debt and Damages. It is
nevertheless a matter of some concern that a
significant number of our other reports since
devolution remain to be implemented. During the
year we have had useful discussions with the
Cabinet Secretary for Justice, and we very much
hope that these will lead to the further
implementation of our reports.
Finally, our success during the year is due to the
dedication, ability and hard work of all of the staff
of the Commission and my fellow Commissioners,
and I would like to pay tribute to them.
It gives me much pleasure to present the
Commission's Annual Report for the year 2007.
Four reports were published during the year, dealing
with the variation and termination of trusts,
limitation and prescribed claims, the implications of
the case of Sharp v Thomson, and rape and other
sexual offences. The Scottish Government has
indicated that during 2008 it will introduce a Bill to
implement the Report on Rape and Other Sexual
Offences, and we very much welcome the prompt
implementation of our reports in this way.
During 2007 we also published discussion papers
dealing with succession and damages for wrongful
death and, jointly with the English Commission, a
consultation paper concerning aspects of insurance
contract law. We have also begun work on two new
projects, on unincorporated associations and
consumer remedies, the latter being a joint project
with the English Commission. Work has also
continued on the very major project dealing with
land registration.
THE HON LORD DRUMMOND YOUNG
Chairman
5

6

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Annual Report 2006
Scot Law Com No 205
Report on Variation and Termination of Trusts
Scot Law Com No 206
Insurance Contract Law: Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and
Breach of Warranty by the Insured – A Joint Consultation Paper
DP No 134
Discussion Paper on Damages for Wrongful Death
DP No 135
Discussion Paper on Succession
DP No 136
Report on Personal Injury Actions: Limitation and Prescribed Claims
Scot Law Com No 207
Report on Sharp v Thomson
Scot Law Com No 208
Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences
Scot Law Com No 209
20 March 2007
30 March 2007
17 July 2007
1 August 2007
16 August 2007
5 December 2007
12 December 2007
19 December 2007
In addition two papers on insurance law, which are not included in our numbered series, were published
jointly with the Law Commission: Issues Paper 3: Intermediaries and Pre-Contract Information, published
in March 2007 and Issues Paper 4: Insurable Interest, published in January 2008.
Copies of all these publications are available on our website www.scotlawcom.gov.uk
7

Seventh Programme of Law Reform
Our Seventh Programme of Law Reform, published
in February 2005, outlines the main projects on
which we will be working up to the end of 2009. It
incorporates ongoing work from our last programme
of law reform and outlines projects on which we are
currently working including those on property law,
succession, trusts, unincorporated associations, and
assignation of, and security over, incorporeal
moveable property. The programme also includes a
criminal law project on the law on provocation, self-
defence, coercion, and necessity.
The programme was prepared after extensive
consultation with the legal profession, a wide range
of other interested bodies and with the public into
areas of law they thought were in need of reform.
The consultation process was extremely helpful and
indeed two projects on which we are working – the
law of succession and on unincorporated
associations - were included in the programme as a
result of suggestions made to us.
During 2008 we will start preparations for our
Eighth Programme which will set out our
programme of work from 2010 to 2014. We expect
to start the consultation process on a draft
programme towards the end of 2008, with a general
public consultation in the first half of 2009.
References from Ministers
While projects under our Seventh Programme form
the core of our law reform work, we also undertake
work in response to references from Ministers.
These projects are an important part of our work
and are usually prompted by concern about specific
areas of law which may need reform. Topics referred
to us are usually on legal issues which need fairly
urgent review. For that reason, we generally aim to
complete work on references within a shorter
timescale than our programme work.
New projects
In November 2007 we received a new reference on
criminal law from the Scottish Ministers inviting us
to consider the law relating to -
•   judicial rulings that can bring a solemn case to
an end without the verdict of a jury and rights of
appeal against such;
•    the principle of double jeopardy and whether
there should be exceptions to it;
•    admissibility of evidence of bad character or of
previous convictions, and of similar fact evidence;
and
. the Moorov doctrine.
This is a substantial reference. For that reason we
have decided that work should be divided into
separate projects. We have started work on the first
two parts of the reference and will turn to the
remaining parts of the reference once those projects
have been completed.

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Recently we received a reference to undertake a
joint project with the Law Commission in London,
on consumer remedies. The project will be looking
at ways of simplifying the remedies available to
consumers, for example when they purchase faulty
goods.
Implementation of our reports
In recent years we have been pleased to assist the
Scottish Government in connection with the
passage of several Bills in the Scottish Parliament
which implemented our recommendations for
reform on a number of topics, particularly property
law. We regard this work as an important part of
our role and one which we hope to continue in the
future.
We hope to assist the Scottish Government during
2008 with implementation of recommendations in
our Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences,
once the public consultation exercise has been
completed.
Further information about implementation of
our reports can be found on the Publications
page of our website
9

Projects under our Seventh
Programme
Land registration
Work is progressing on our report and draft Bill,
both of which are likely to be lengthy. The project
is a medium-term one under our Seventh
Programme and as such is due for completion by
the end of 2009 at latest. We hope to complete
this project by the end of 2008 or in the first half
of 2009.
Trusts
Project Team
Professor George Gretton, Commissioner
John Dods, Project Manager
Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant
John Glover, Registers of Scotland
Project Team
Professor Joe Thomson, Commissioner
Colin Tyre QC, Commissioner
David Nichols, Project Manager
Lyndsey Foggarty, Legal Assistant
The modern system of land registration was
introduced by the Land Registration (Scotland) Act
1979. The new system has brought with it many
benefits. But experience has disclosed certain
shortcomings in the legislation, and it became
apparent some years ago that a review would be
desirable. The project is aimed at enhancing the
technical functionality of the system, improving the
fit between registration law and general property
law, removing certain practical difficulties arising
from the current legislation, bringing clarity to
matters that are obscure under that legislation, and
overhauling existing property statutes to make them
e-compatible. Registers of Scotland have provided,
and are continuing to provide, extensive support for
the project and we are most grateful to them for
that support.
The issues involved are complex and for that reason
we published three separate discussion papers on
different aspects of reform. The first discussion
paper - on Void and Voidable Titles - examined the
legal policy issues underlying land registration, while
the Discussion Paper on Registration, Rectification
and Indemnity considered the provisions of the
1979 Act. The third discussion paper - on
Miscellaneous Issues - dealt with topics such as
descriptions and boundaries, servitudes, overriding
interests, and decision-making by the Keeper of the
Registers of Scotland.
Trust law is a long-term project which is likely to be
carried forward into our next programme of law
reform. It is a substantial project and for that
reason we are working on it in two main stages,
dealing with trusts and trustees.
We have published five discussion papers so far,
covering a range of topics:
•  Breach of Trust
•  Apportionment of Trust Receipts and Outgoings
•  Trustees and Trust Administration
•  Variation and Termination of Trusts
•  The Nature and Constitution of Trusts
The first of our Reports – on Variation and
Termination of Trusts – was published in March
2007. Our recommendations address some of the
difficulties that arise when private trusts are varied
or terminated and seek to simplify the
reorganisation of charities, public trusts and
endowments.
10

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
As regards private trusts, at present the beneficiaries if
all of full age and capacity may agree to vary the
trust, terminate it or resettle the trust property in
another trust. As there was no support from
consultees for change, the Report recommends that
the present position be given statutory authority and
the draft Bill annexed to the Report sets out new
statutory provisions. We also recommend that parents
or guardians should continue not to be permitted to
agree to a variation or termination on behalf of a
child who is a beneficiary under a trust, because of
the likelihood of there being a conflict of interest.
Section 1 of the Trusts (Scotland) Act 1961 allows
the court to approve on behalf of underage, unborn
or incapable beneficiaries a variation or termination
of a private trust. The Report recommends a number
of changes to improve the way this section works in
practice by giving the court the following additional
powers:
•    power to exonerate trustees from liability where
an interest of negligible value which has been cut
out by the variation unexpectedly emerges;
•    power to approve a variation which would
prejudice an unborn beneficiary if there is no
reasonable likelihood of such a beneficiary being
born;
•    power to approve a variation on behalf of an
untraceable beneficiary;
•    power to take non-economic considerations into
account in assessing whether there is prejudice to
an underage, incapable or unborn beneficiary.
In the public trust field there are different regimes
for reorganising endowments, charities and non-
charity public trusts. We recommend that the
criteria for reorganisation should be simplified,
should be the same for all, and that the Office of the
Scottish Charity Regulator (which approves
reorganisations of charities) should also deal with
reorganisations of public trusts and endowments.
We are now considering liability of trustees to third
parties with a view to publishing a discussion paper
on this topic early in 2008.
Succession
Project Team
Professor Joe Thomson, Commissioner
David Nichols, Project Manager
Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant
We decided to undertake a further review of the law
of succession following suggestions made to us
during consultation on a draft of our Seventh
Programme. Our earlier Report on Succession,
published in 1990, dealt with a wide range of issues
but has not been implemented.
The current project is re-examining succession law
to ensure that it reflects current social attitudes and
deals with the types of relationship which have
become fairly common in Scotland in recent years.
We published a Discussion Paper in August 2007.
The two main parts of the Discussion Paper consider
the rights of surviving spouses, civil partners,
cohabitants, children and stepchildren on intestacy;
and whether these relatives should be protected
against disinheritance and how such protection is
best achieved.
In relation to the law of intestacy, we propose that
where there are no surviving issue, the surviving
spouse or civil partner should be entitled to the
whole estate. Where there are also surviving issue,
we propose that the surviving spouse or civil partner
should continue to have a measure of priority as at
present and should be entitled to the deceased's
whole estate up to £300,000 with half of any excess
being shared equally with the issue.
Following concerns expressed by members of our
advisory group, the Discussion Paper also considers
11

whether executors-dative appointed by the court in
intestate estates should continue to be required to
find caution.
In cases of testate succession we propose a rule-
based scheme of protection for surviving spouses or
civil partners whereby the survivor would be entitled
to 25% of what he or she would have received had
the deceased died intestate under our new intestacy
proposals. We propose extending to testate estates
the recently enacted court-based protection scheme
in section 29 of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006
for people whose cohabitating partners died
intestate. We also favour a court-based scheme for
dependent children to whom the deceased owed an
obligation of aliment. We tend to think that there
should be no protection for adult children, but if
they are to be protected then we put forward a rule-
based scheme with the entitlement being 25% of
what the child would have received on intestacy.
The Discussion Paper also considers whether
provisions should be introduced in order to prevent
a person evading before death the proposed
protections against disinheritance by way of lifetime
gifts, the prescription of disinheritance claims, and
private international law matters.
The consultation period ended in December. We are
now considering the responses with a view to
completing our report around the end of 2008.
David Nichols, Maria Theodossiou and Professor Joe Thomson
12

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Assignation of and security over
incorporeal moveable property
Project Team
Professor George Gretton, Commissioner
John Dods, Project Manager
Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant
This project was suggested to us by the Law Society
of Scotland and a number of other consultees during
consultation on items for inclusion in our current
programme of law reform. It is a substantial long-
term project which we intend to carry forward into
our next programme of law reform, starting in 2010.
The resources available to the project will continue
to be limited until the land registration project has
been completed.
During the year we studied developments in this
area in a number of European countries. We also
embarked on a series of pre-consultation meetings.
Those we met included representatives of the
Insolvency Practitioners Association, HM Revenue &
Customs, the Royal Bank of Scotland, CBI Scotland,
and solicitors' firms with clients who are involved in
such transactions. During 2008 we intend to hold
further pre-consultation meetings.
13

Unincorporated associations
Judicial factors
Our Seventh Programme includes a project to
review the law relating to judicial factors. The
legislation on this topic has been in existence for
over a hundred years and requires to be updated to
suit modern needs.
We have completed our research for a discussion
paper, which we had hoped to publish during 2007.
However, we have not been able to complete the
discussion paper as we have had to give priority to
completing our project on rape and other sexual
offences. Furthermore, as we now need to devote
resources to the new reference on criminal law, we
have decided to suspend work on this project
meantime.
Provocation, self-defence, coercion,
and necessity
We included in our current programme a project to
review the defences of provocation, self-defence,
coercion and necessity, as a follow-up to our earlier
Report on Insanity and Diminished Responsibility,
published in 2004. The decision to undertake the
project arose in part from the case of Drury v HM
Advocate 2001 SCCR 583, in which the court
commented that the law of provocation should be
reformed and restated in statutory form. We
decided to extend the scope of the project to
include self-defence, coercion and necessity as those
topics are also in need of review.
We had planned to start work on this project once
we had completed our review of the law of rape and
other sexual offences. As we have been asked by
Scottish Ministers to give priority to the new
criminal law reference, which we received in
November 2007, we have deferred work on this
project for the time being, although we intend to
consult on whether the project should be carried
forward into our next programme of law reform, due
to start in 2010.
Project Team
Colin Tyre QC, Commissioner
Gillian Swanson, Project Manager
Lyndsey Foggarty, Legal Assistant
Unincorporated associations exist for a wide variety
of purposes and in a wide range of sizes and
structures. At one end of the scale they may be
substantial organisations with property, employees
and contractual commitments. At the other end,
they may be informal groupings of individuals
joining together for temporary and specific purposes.
In Scots law, such associations are not recognised as
having a separate legal personality. It is this absence
of personality which can create difficulties especially
in connection with entering into contracts, owning
property and dealing with claims by or against the
association and its members. The project will look
at ways of removing the current difficulties, possibly
by giving some form of legal status to
unincorporated associations.
The subject matter of this project is reserved under
the Scotland Act 1998 and any recommendations
which we may make will fall to be implemented by
the United Kingdom Parliament. For that reason we
intend to keep in close touch with the Department
for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform as
regards progress with our work.
We have completed our initial research and have
recently discussed a short preliminary paper with
several interested parties. We aim to publish a
discussion paper in the second half of 2008.
14

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
References from Scottish
Ministers
Rape and other sexual offences
We recommend that the crime of rape should
continue to be tried only in the High Court and that
there should be a maximum sentence of life
imprisonment for rape, sexual assault and certain
acts of sexual coercion.
For the first time in Scots law, the meaning of
consent, which lies at the heart of the new offences,
is to be made clear. It is defined as 'free agreement'
and we set out a list of situations in which there is
no consent, such as when a person is incapable
through intoxication, or is threatened with violence,
or is deceived about the purpose of the sexual
activity.
One of the main aims of our recommendations is to
ensure that there is no distinction between male
and female victims or between male and female
perpetrators. Many of the current offences are
framed in a way which does not respect this
principle. As part of this aim we recommend the
repeal of offences based on sexual orientation as we
see no general justification for consenting conduct
being criminal.
Another principle which we have sought to promote
is that of sexual autonomy. This means that non-
consenting sexual conduct should be criminal, as it
represents an invasion of the victim's sexual
autonomy, while consenting sexual conduct should
not be criminal unless there are powerful reasons for
creating an offence.
A further principle which we have adopted in the
Report – the 'protective principle' – is that some
people should be protected from all sexual activity,
such as young children, while more limited
protection should cover those who may be able to
consent to sexual activity but who should be
protected in view of their relative immaturity or
vulnerability.
Project Team
Professor Gerry Maher QC, Commissioner
Charles Garland, Project Manager
Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant
We completed work on this project in December
when our wide ranging Report on Rape and Other
Sexual Offences was published. The Report marks
an important stage in the first ever systematic
review of Scots law on sexual offences.
We were asked by Scottish Ministers to review this
area of law following two widely-reported High
Court cases in 2004 and concern among
professionals involved in this area of law as well as
the general public that the law was unclear.
The Report recommends an extension to the
definition of rape aimed at protecting both male
and female victims. It also recommends the
creation of the new offence of sexual assault which
would cover sexual touching or other forms of
sexual contact without the victim's consent. In
addition sexual coercion would be made a crime.
This means that it would be an offence to make a
person watch or participate in a sexual activity
without the person's consent. It would also cover
the sending of sexual e-mails and other
communications without the recipient's consent, if
the sender acts out of sexual gratification or an
intention to humiliate or distress the recipient.
15

In our Discussion Paper, published in January 2006,
we sought views on whether the existing rules of
corroboration should be relaxed or removed in
respect of sexual offences. The vast majority of
consultees were opposed to removing corroboration
in cases involving sexual offences. In view of this
response we have concluded that if the rules on
corroboration need to be reviewed they should be
considered as part of a general review of
corroboration as it applies throughout the criminal
law. For that reason the Report makes no
recommendations as regards corroboration in
relation to sexual offences.
On publication of the Report the Scottish
Government announced a public consultation on
our recommendations with a view to introducing a
Bill in the Scottish Parliament in 2008.
Crown appeals
At present there are two types of ruling which
directly lead to an acquittal - a ruling on a
submission of no case to answer under the Criminal
Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 - and a ruling
following what is called a "common law submission"
which follows the conclusion of evidence. A judge
may also make rulings on other matters such as the
admissibility of essential pieces of evidence which,
while not formally amounting to an acquittal,
undermine the prosecution case to the extent that
an acquittal becomes inevitable.
Although the issues involved in the project arose in
some recent criminal decisions, the project will
consider the issues in the broad context of the
criminal law generally.
We started initial research for the project towards
the end of 2007. We also established a small group
comprising members of the Judiciary to assist us
and had our first meeting with them in December.
We aim to consult on our proposals in the spring
with a view to reporting with recommendations for
reform in the summer of 2008.
Project Team
The Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner
Alastair Smith, Project Manager
Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant
This topic is the first part of the new reference on
criminal law, received from Scottish Ministers in
November.
This part of the reference relates to judicial rulings
that can bring a case under solemn criminal
procedure to an end without the merits of the case
being considered by a jury, and Crown rights of
appeal against such rulings.
16

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Double jeopardy
Personal injury actions: limitation and
prescribed claims
Project Team
Professor Gerry Maher QC, Commissioner
Alastair Smith, Project Manager
Nicola McGowan, Legal Assistant
Project Team
The Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner
Susan Sutherland, Project Manager
Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant
This topic forms the second part of the recent
reference from Scottish Ministers on criminal justice
topics.
In general terms the principle of double jeopardy is
that a person may not be tried more than once for
the same offence. Similar reviews have been
undertaken in other jurisdictions which we will be
examining as part of our work.
The project will examine the operation of the
principle of double jeopardy in existing Scots law.
We will also review the rationales underlying the
principle of double jeopardy and consider whether
grounds may exist for making any exceptions
to it.
We have started initial research and a study of
comparative law with a view to preparing a
discussion paper.
This project was completed in December with the
publication of our Report on Personal Injury Actions:
Limitation and Prescribed Claims.
The Report is in response to two references by the
Scottish Ministers in September 2004 and August
2005. The first reference related to the provisions of
the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
which set out the rules of limitation in personal
injury actions. The second reference, which
concerned prescribed claims, arose from concerns by
survivors of alleged institutional child abuse that
they could not bring claims for damages because
their right of action had been extinguished as a
result of the law of prescription.
As regards the limitation rules, the Report
recommends a five-year limitation period for
personal injury actions in place of the current three-
year limit. The longer period is aimed at assisting
claimants and their advisers, particularly in cases
involving claims for occupational diseases, where
gathering evidence to bring a claim for damages can
be very time consuming and difficult. The Report
recommends changes to the statutory knowledge
test so that it focuses on the key question of the
seriousness of the pursuer's injuries.
In connection with the judicial discretion to allow
time-barred actions to proceed where the court
thinks it is appropriate, we recommend the
introduction of a statutory list of factors which the
court may take into account when exercising its
discretion.
17

As regards the second reference, while we have
sympathy with alleged victims of institutional child
abuse and others whose claims have been
extinguished by prescription we recommend that
such claims should not be revived, for a number of
reasons which we outline in the Report.
The Report includes a draft Bill which if
implemented would give effect to our
recommendations for amendments to the 1973 Act.
Sharp v Thomson
to ensure that floating charges cannot attach to
the property without the attachment having
been publicly registered - the "no attachment
without registration" principle.
The Report also recommends the abolition of an
antiquated rule which allows the liquidator of an
insolvent corporate seller to out-manoeuvre a buyer
by means of an immediate "completion of title".
Two proposals in our earlier Discussion Paper are not
included in the recommendations. One of the
proposals related to the doctrine of the "purchaser's
beneficial interest", but following the House of Lords
decision in Burnett's Trustee v Grainger 2004 SC (HL)
19, there is no longer any need for legislation on
that issue.
The other proposal has already been implemented in
section 17 of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc.
(Scotland) Act 2007, which enhances a buyer's
protection against the insolvency of an individual
non-corporate seller.
Project Team
Professor George Gretton, Commissioner
John Dods, Project Manager
Ross Sanderson, Legal Assistant
We completed work on this project in December
with the publication of our Report, which makes
recommendations to Scottish Ministers arising out
of the case of Sharp v Thomson 1997 SC (HL) 66.
At present someone buying property can, in certain
circumstances, lose the property if a corporate seller
becomes insolvent before the purchaser registers
title to it. While the current law is satisfactory at
protecting someone who purchases property against
the risk that an individual seller might become
insolvent, it is less satisfactory in the case of a
corporate seller.
With the aim of reducing the risk where a company
sells property, the Report recommends that the rules
be tightened -
to ensure that buyers can readily find out
whether winding-up proceedings against a
corporate seller have been initiated.
18

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Damages for wrongful death
Our Discussion Paper, published in August,
considered the issues for reform in each of these
cases. It also invited views on the reform of the
relatives' right to claim damages, on whether or not
awards under section 1(4) of the Damages
(Scotland) Act 1976 should be retained and, if so,
what changes should be made to how they operate
in practice.
Following consultation on our proposals, we are
working on our report and draft Bill which will be
published in the summer of 2008.
Project Team
Professor Joe Thomson, Commissioner
Susan Sutherland, Project Manager
Janet Hall, Legal Assistant
When the Bill which became the Rights of Relatives
to Damages (Scotland) Act 2007 was being debated
in the Scottish Parliament, Scottish Ministers
concluded that some aspects of the law of damages
for wrongful death merited further examination. As
a consequence in September 2006 we were invited
to undertake a review of the law and in particular
the provisions of the Damages (Scotland) Act 1976.
When a person is injured as a result of the wrongful
actions of another, the injured party is usually
entitled to some form of compensation for loss
suffered, whether the loss is patrimonial (financial)
or non-patrimonial (non-monetary such as the loss
of expectation of life). Where the injured person
dies as a result of the injuries, three possibilities
arise:
. the victim may have raised proceedings and
claimed compensation from the responsible
person before death;
the victim may die before proceedings have been
completed; and
the victim may die before raising proceedings.
19

Joint projects with the Law
Commission
parties. The law says one thing, the FSA rules
require another and the FOS reaches decisions
based on a third.
Insurance contract law
The Commissions' proposals distinguish between
business and consumer policyholders. For
consumers, they largely reflect the FSA rules and
FOS guidelines. A clear distinction is made between
those who act deliberately or recklessly, those who
act carelessly and those who act reasonably. Similar
suggestions are made for business policyholders
although for them the proposals would operate as a
default regime.
We aim to publish a further consultation paper
around spring 2009. In that connection, we have
recently published an Issues Paper on Insurable
Interest. We will also be looking at damages for late
payment, fraud and post-contractual good faith.
Consumer remedies
Project Team
Colin Tyre QC, Commissioner
Gillian Swanson, Project Manager
Janet Hall, Trainee Solicitor
We are assisting the Law Commission with this
project which they are carrying out under their
Ninth Programme of Law Reform.
Insurance law is criticised as being outmoded and, in
some cases, unfair to policy holders. This project
aims to modernise the law and make it fairer.
Following a series of Issues Papers (a means of
sharing initial thinking with interested parties), our
joint Consultation Paper on Insurance Contract Law:
Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach of
Warranty by the Insured was published in July 2007.
The consultation period ended in November. The
response has been excellent and we are most
grateful to all those who have taken the time to let
us have their views.
The proposals largely focus on misrepresentation
and non-disclosure and explore the issues around
what happens when claimants make mistakes in
application forms or when they fail to mention facts
which the insurer would regard as relevant.
The industry, aware that the Marine Insurance Act
1906 is outdated and inappropriate to a modern
consumer market, has compensated with codes of
practice. Regulation by the Financial Services
Authority (FSA) and the dispute resolution service
provided by the Financial Ombudsman Service
(FOS) have also mitigated the harsh effects of the
law. Whilst well intentioned, this is confusing for all
Project Team
The Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner
Gillian Swanson, Project Manager
Maria Theodossiou, Legal Assistant
The Department for Business, Enterprise and
Regulatory Reform has asked us to look at
simplifying the remedies which are available to
consumers when they purchase goods which do not
conform to contract because, for example, they are
faulty. We have also been asked to look at remedies
relating to the supply of goods. This is a joint
project with the Law Commission for England and
Wales.
20

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
This area of law is unnecessarily complex due to an
overlap of domestic and EU remedies. One result of
this complexity is that consumers, sales staff and
trained consumer advisers find the law difficult to
understand.
The EU Commission is currently carrying out a
general review of consumer directives, including the
Consumer Sales Directive which was implemented in
the UK in 2002. As part of this project, the
Department has asked us to advise it on any issues
which appear to be of relevance to that review.
Our aim will be to recommend appropriate remedies
which make this area of the law easier for all users
to understand and use. We plan to publish a joint
consultation paper in the second half of 2008.
21

Progress on our law reform projects
Projects under our Seventh Programme
Land registration
Discussion Papers on -
•  Land Registration: Void and Voidable Titles (No 125)
published February 2004
•  Land Registration: Registration, Rectification and
Indemnity (No 128) published August 2005
•  Land Registration: Miscellaneous Issues (No 130)
published December 2005
Working on report
and draft Bill
Trusts
Discussion Papers on –
•  Breach of Trust (No 123) published September 2003
•  Apportionment of Trust Receipts and Outgoings (No
124) published September 2003
•  Trustees and Trust Administration (No 126) published
December 2004
•  Variation and Termination of Trusts (No 129)
published December 2005
•  The Nature and the Constitution of Trusts (No 133)
published October 2006
Report on –
•  Variation and Termination of Trusts (Scot Law Com No
206) published March 2007
Working on
Discussion Paper
on Liability of
Trustees to Third
Parties
Succession
Discussion Paper on Succession (No 136) published
August 2007
Working on report
and draft Bill
Judicial factors
Work suspended
Assignation of,
and security over,
incorporeal moveable
property
Undertaking
research for
discussion paper
Unincorporated
associations
Undertaking
research for
discussion paper
Provocation, self-
defence, coercion,
and necessity
Project not yet
started
22

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
References from Ministers
Rape and other
sexual offences
Discussion Paper on Rape and Other Sexual Offences (No
131) published January 2006
Report on Rape and Other Sexual Offences (Scot Law
Com No 209) published December 2007
Project completed
Crown appeals
Working on
discussion paper
Double jeopardy
Undertaking
research for
discussion paper
Evidential questions
Project not yet
started
Personal injury
actions: limitation
and prescribed
claims
Discussion Paper on Personal Injury Actions: Limitation and
Prescribed Claims (No 132) published February 2006
Report on Personal Injury Actions: Limitation and Prescribed
Claims (Scot Law Com No 207) published December 2007
Project completed
Sharp v Thomson
Discussion Paper on Sharp v Thomson (No 114) published
July 2001
Report on Sharp v Thomson (Scot Law Com No 208)
published December 2007
Project completed
Damages for
wrongful death
Discussion Paper on Damages for Wrongful Death (No
135) published August 2007
Working on report
and draft Bill
Joint projects with the Law Commission
Insurance contract
law
Consultation Paper on Insurance Contract Law:
Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure and Breach of Warranty
by the Insured (No 134) published July 2007
Analysing
comments and
working on second
consultation paper
Consumer remedies
Undertaking
research for joint
consultation paper
23

Consolidation
Statute law repeals
Project Team
Project Team
The Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner
Susan Sutherland, Project Manager
Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant
The Hon Lord Drummond Young, Commissioner
Susan Sutherland, Project Manager
Cara Jardine, Legal Assistant
One of our statutory functions is to undertake work
on consolidation of legislation. Consolidation
involves bringing together a number of statutes in
an area of law into a single Act, with the aim of
modernising the language and simplifying the
provisions. Most of our consolidation work is
undertaken jointly with the Law Commission and
involves assisting in preparing a draft consolidation
Bill.
We are assisting the Law Commission with work on
a Bill to consolidate the legislation relating to
representation of the people. Work is progressing on
this substantial consolidation with the aim of
producing an up to date Act on this area of electoral
law. The Bill will reflect legislative changes in recent
years, including those introduced by the Electoral
Administration Act 2006.
Another of our statutory functions is to make
recommendations for the repeal of obsolete or
otherwise unnecessary legislation. Along with
consolidation, this work plays an important part in
keeping legislation up to date and making it easier
for people to use legislation.
We undertake work on statute law repeals jointly
with the Law Commission, undertaking consultation
with appropriate bodies in relation to repeals that
relate to Scotland.
Work has recently been completed on the
Eighteenth Statute Law (Repeals) Report and draft
Bill, which was published at the end of January
2008. The Bill covers a wide range of subjects
including legislation relating to police, criminal law
and town and country planning. The repeal
candidates were developed through research by the
Law Commission and consultation with appropriate
bodies, including where appropriate bodies in
Scotland.
Susan Sutherland
24

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
An important part of our work involves promoting
law reform. Throughout the year we worked closely
with the Law Commission on our joint projects and
on matters of law reform generally. We provided
comments on the Law Commission's provisional
topics for inclusion in its tenth programme of law
reform, which is due to start in April 2008. Some of
the topics identified would be carried out jointly by
the two Commissions.
In July the Chairman, Professor Maher and the Chief
Executive attended a joint meeting of the Law
Commissions for Northern Ireland, England and
Wales, Ireland and Scotland, in Dublin.
In September our Chief Executive represented the
Commission at the second biennial conference in
Nairobi on "Encouraging International Cooperation
on Law Reform". The conference was held in
conjunction with the Commonwealth Law
Conference on "Governance, Globalisation and the
Commonwealth".
We also promote our work and an interest in law
reform by attendance at law reform conferences and
seminars.
Commissioners and Chief Executive with three of the English Law
Commissioners and Chief Executive during a joint meeting in
Edinburgh in May 2007.
We maintained our close working relationship with
the Scottish Government and were pleased to
welcome the Cabinet Secretary for Justice, Mr Kenny
MacAskill who visited us in November.
During the year we participated in a number of
international and other events aimed at fostering
links between law reform agencies and encouraging
an interest in law reform work.
25

26

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
Commissioners and staff
Commissioners
The Hon Lord James Drummond Young, Chairman
Professor George Gretton
Professor Gerry Maher QC
Professor Joe Thomson
Colin Tyre QC
Legal assistants
Lyndsey Foggarty
Cara Jardine
Nicola McGowan
Ross Sanderson
Maria Theodossiou
Chief executive
Michael Lugton
Librarian
Nick Brotchie
Parliamentary counsel
Gregor Clark CB
Office manager
Lesley Young
Project managers
John Dods
Charles Garland
David Nichols
Alastair Smith
Susan Sutherland
Gillian Swanson
Personal secretaries
Joan Melville
Heather Ryan
Administrative and typing
services staff
Jackie Palkowski
Iain Ritchie
Calum Robertson
Gordon Speirs
Trainee solicitor
Janet Hall
27

We thank the members of our advisory groups
for their assistance with our law reform projects
in 2007
Rape and other sexual offences
Sandy Brindley, Rape Crisis Scotland
James Chalmers, University of Edinburgh
Brian Dempsey, Outright Scotland
Iain Fleming Solicitor
Janette de Haan, Glasgow Women's Support Project
Tim Hopkins, Equality Network
Louise Johnson, Scottish Women's Aid
Frances McMenamin QC
Stephanie Whitehead, Brook
Damages for wrongful death
Professor Douglas Brodie, University of Edinburgh
Laura Dunlop QC
Roderick Dunlop Advocate
Gilles Graham Solicitor
Maria Maguire QC
Harvey McGregor QC
Thomas Marshall Solicitor
Land registration
Professor Stewart Brymer Solicitor
Professor Roderick Paisley, University of Aberdeen
Professor Kenneth Reid, University of Edinburgh
Professor Robert Rennie, University of Glasgow
Personal injury actions
Robert Carr Solicitor
David Johnston QC
Ranald Macdonald, Scottish Health Service Central
Legal Office
Robert Milligan Advocate
Fiona Moore Solicitor
Trusts
Alan Barr Solicitor, University of Edinburgh
Graham Burnside Solicitor
Robert Chill Solicitor
Andrew Dalgleish Solicitor
Frank Fletcher Solicitor
Alexander McDonald Solicitor
Christopher McGill Society of Trust and Estate
Practitioners (Scotland)
Simon A Mackintosh Solicitor
James McNeill QC
Allan Nicolson Consultant Solicitor
Professor Kenneth Norrie, University of Strathclyde
Scott Rae Solicitor
Alister Sutherland Consultant Solicitor
Succession
Alan Barr Solicitor, University of Edinburgh
John Kerrigan Solicitor
Ross Macdonald, University of Dundee
Christopher McGill, Society of Trust and Estate
Practitioners (Scotland)
Iain Maclean Advocate
Professor Michael Meston, University of Aberdeen
Malcolm Strang Steel Solicitor
Eilidh Scobbie Solicitor
Scott Rae Solicitor
Gordon Wyllie Solicitor
Insurance law
Sarah P L Wolffe Advocate
Professor Angelo Forte, University of Aberdeen
28

SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT 2007
The Commission receives its funding from the Scottish Government. Our running costs for 2007 were offset
by payment received from Skills for Justice and the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historic Monuments
of Scotland for use of part of our office accommodation.
Salaries - Commissioners
(including national insurance contributions,
superannuation payments and pensions to
former Commissioners)
Salaries - Chief Executive and legal staff
(including national insurance contributions,
superannuation payments and consultants'
fees and expenses)
Salaries - administrative staff
(including national insurance contributions
and superannuation payments)
Accommodation
(including maintenance, rates and utilities)
Printing and publishing
(including costs of books and library purchases,
binding, machinery maintenance, photocopying,
reprographic services and stationery)
Telephone and postage
Travel and subsistence
Miscellaneous
(including training, office services and hospitality)
Total
£000            £000
585.5
£000            £000
542.0
564.5
570.1
176.5          1326.5
171.8          1283.9
49.8
60.3
91.6
94.8
10.1
12.2
7.9
12.6
23.8
21.1
£1509.7
£1484.9
29

Scottish Law Commission
promoting law reform
Our law reform work involves-
Research into the existing Scots law and review of comparative law
Analysis of problems with the current law
Development of policies for reform
Consultation on proposed reforms
Consideration of consultation responses
Review of policy in the light of consultation
Publication of a report to Ministers with recommendations for reform, including in most cases
a draft Bill to implement the recommendations. Implementation of the recommendations in our
reports requiring legislation is taken forward in the Scottish Parliament or in some cases in the UK
Parliament at Westminster
For more information about the Commission please contact:
Michael Lugton, Chief Executive
Scottish Law Commission
140 Causewayside Edinburgh EH9 1PR
Tel: 0131 668 2131
Fax: 0131 662 4900
FOI enquiries: [email protected]
This report is available on our website.
It may also be purchased from TSO Scotland Bookshop.
This publication (excluding the Scottish Law Commission logo) may be re-used free of charge in any format or medium
for research for non-commercial purposes, private study or for internal circulation within an organisation. This is subject
to it being re-used accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown
copyright and the title of the publication specified.
For any other use of this material please apply for a Click-Use Licence from the Office of Public Sector Information (OPSI)
website: www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/index.htm.
Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited
On behalf of the Queen's Printer for Scotland
C3 02/08
30


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/other/SLC/Report/2008/211.html