BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA028952013 [2013] UKAITUR IA028952013 (20 September 2013)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/IA028952013.html
Cite as: [2013] UKAITUR IA28952013, [2013] UKAITUR IA028952013

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/02895/2013

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Determined at Field House

Date sent 20 September 2013

On 18 September 2013

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MCGEACHY

Between

 

 

 

Krisler Joystan Dsouza

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

DETERMINATION

 

 

 

  1. On 24 June 2013 I considered an application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal. I found that the Judge in the First-tier had made no arguable error of law in his determination when he had considered the merits of the appellant’s against the refusal of an extension of stay but that it was arguable that he should have allowed the appeal against the decision of the respondent to issue removal directions under section 47 of the Immigration, Nationality and Asylum Act 2006.

 

  1. I directed that unless I received submissions to the contrary within 14 days I would substitute for the decision of the judge dismissing the appeal against the refusal of the extension of stay a decision to dismiss the appeal against that refusal and a decision to allow the appeal against the decision to remove under Section 47. The respondent has agreed to this curse of action. there has been no response form the appellant. I therefore now make the following decision:

 

 

Decision

The appeal against the refusal of the extension of stay and on human rights grounds is dismissed.

The appeal against the decision to remove under Section 47 is allowed.

 

 

 

 

Signed Date: 18 September 2013

 

 

Upper Tribunal Judge McGeachy


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/IA028952013.html