BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA119662007 [2015] UKAITUR AA119662007 (10 November 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/AA119662007.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR AA119662007 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
The Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number AA/11966/2007
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Decision and Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 10 November 2015 |
|
|
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE PERKINS
Between
A- M- A-
(anonymity order in force)
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
NOTICE THAT APPEAL IS ABANDONED
1) Pursuant to Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/269) I make an anonymity order. Unless the Upper Tribunal or a Court directs otherwise, no report of these proceedings or any form of publication thereof shall directly or indirectly identify the original Appellant. This direction applies to, amongst others, all parties. Any failure to comply with this direction could give rise to contempt of court proceedings. I make this order because there is a slight risk that publicity might create a risk for the Appellant's safety.
2) Pursuant to rule 17A of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, by letter dated 4 November 2015 the Respondent notified the Tribunal that on 28 October 2015 the Appellant was granted limited leave to remain in the United Kingdom.
3) By reason of section 104(4B) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 the Appellant's appeal should be treated a abandoned unless the Appellant notifies the Tribunal that he wishes to pursue the appeal on the ground that he is entitled to humanitarian protection.
4) In response to Directions abridging the time for notifying the Tribunal of the Appellant's intentions, by letter dated 6 November 2015 the Appellant's solicitors notified that Tribunal that the Appellant "is content for his appeal to be treated as abandoned".
5) In the premises the Appellant's appeal is abandoned.
Signed |
|
Jonathan Perkins Judge of the Upper Tribunal |
Dated 9 November 2015 |