BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA052032013 & Ors. [2015] UKAITUR IA052032013 (28 August 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA052032013.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA052032013, [2015] UKAITUR IA52032013 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal numbers: IA/05203/2013
IA/05207/2013
IA/05210/2013
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision and Reasons Promulgated |
On 26 August 2015 |
On 28 August 2015 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O'CONNOR
Between
hAK
HK
SK
(Anonymity Direction Made)
Appellants
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representatives
For the Appellants: Mr Chhotu, instructed by Pro Bono Unit
For the Respondent: Mr Walker, Senior Presenting Office
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND
REASONS FOR THE TRIBUNAL GIVING CONSENT
1. I make an anonymity direction pursuant to Rule 14 of the Upper Tribunal (Tribunal Procedure) Rules 2008 - prohibiting disclosure or publication of documents or information which is likely to lead members of the public to be able to identify the appellants.
2. The appellants are citizens of Pakistan. Each of the appellants is a minor. They appealed, along with their parents, against the Respondent's decision to refuse them EEA Residence Cards. The First-tier Tribunal allowed the appeals of their parents to the extent that their applications remain outstanding to be lawfully considered by the Respondent. The abovementioned minor appellants' appeals were dismissed. Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was thereafter given to the appellants.
3. At the hearing Mr Walker indicated that the Respondent would not undertake further consideration of the appellants' parents' applications without also giving further consideration to the appellants' circumstances.
4. As a consequence of this indication Mr Chhotu, after having taken instruction from his clients, sought to withdraw the appellants' cases. No objection was taken by Mr Walker to this course and I accordingly gave my consent to such withdrawal.
5. Thus with my consent and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 the appellants' cases are recorded as "Withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal". This is a Notice pursuant to rule 17(5) to inform the parties that the appellants' cases are withdrawn.
6. The effect of the appellants' cases being withdrawn from the Upper Tribunal is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end. There is no appeal before the Upper Tribunal. The First-tier Tribunal's decision shall stand.
Signed:
Upper Tribunal Judge O'Connor
Date: 27 August 2015