BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA140882016 [2018] UKAITUR EA140882016 (31 July 2018)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA140882016.html
Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA140882016

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: Ea/14088/201 6

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 26 July 2018

On 31 July 2018

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK

 

 

Between

 

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Appellant

and

 

DOMINIC OTCHERE

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

For the Appellant: Mr I. Jarvis, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

For the Respondent: Mr E. Waheed, Counsel

 

 

DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 40(3)(a) OF THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008

1.              Although the appellant in these proceedings is the Secretary of State, I refer to the parties as they were before the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT").

2.              The appellant appealed to the FtT against a decision to refuse a permanent residence card as the wife of an EEA national exercising Treaty rights. His appeal was allowed. Permission to appeal against the FtT's decision was granted to the Secretary of State and the appeal came before me.

3.              At the hearing before me it was agreed between the parties that there was no error of law in the FtT's decision allowing the appeal and that its decision to allow the appeal should stand.

4.              Accordingly, I am not satisfied that there is an error of law in the decision of the FtT and therefore its decision allowing the appeal stands.

5.              Pursuant to rule 40(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, no reasons (or further reasons) are required, the decision being made with the consent of the parties.

 

Upper Tribunal Judge Kopieczek 26/07/18

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA140882016.html