BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU068062018 [2019] UKAITUR HU068062018 (6 March 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/HU068062018.html
Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR HU068062018, [2019] UKAITUR HU68062018

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/06806/2018

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Field House

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 18 February 2019

On 6 March 2019

 

 

 

 

Before

 

DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN

 

 

Between

 

Kyunghwan Cha

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION not made)

 

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellant: Mr R Parkin of Counsel instructed by David Wyld & Co Solicitors

For the Respondent: Ms K Pal, Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DECISION AND REASONS

 

1.              This is an appeal against the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Samimi that was promulgated on 8 November 2018.

2.              At the start of the hearing both parties agreed that there had been an error of law and submitted that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh. The reason there is agreement as to there having been an error of law is that the judge applied a version of paragraph 276B of the Immigration Rules that had been superseded and was not applicable.

3.              I agree with the parties and therefore remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh before a different judge.

4.              No anonymity direction is made.

 

Decision

 

a. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal contains a material error of law and is set aside.

 

b. The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh before a different judge.

 

 

 

 

Signed

 

 

 

 

 


Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan

 

 

Dated: 4 March 2019

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/HU068062018.html