BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA114972017 [2019] UKAITUR PA114972017 (14 February 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA114972017.html
Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR PA114972017

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/11497/2017

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Glasgow

On 24 January 2019

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 14 February 2019

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

 

Between

 

S S [K]

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

For the Appellant: Ms N Loughran, of Loughran & Co, Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr M Matthews, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.              The appellant appeals against the decision of FtT Judge Gillespie, promulgated on 11 May 2018, on the grounds set out at [1 - 8] of his application dated 24 July 2018.

2.              Mr Matthews conceded that grounds [1 - 3], at least, disclosed errors of such significance that the decision could not safely stand.

3.              Those grounds showed that [1] the judge found a discrepancy in the appellant's evidence about his arrest, where there was none; [2] the judge found an omission in an answer about injuries when there was none, looking at the question asked and bearing in mind the nature of a screening interview; and [3] the judge was incorrect in saying that the appellant did not mention his injuries at his asylum interview.

4.              Representatives agreed that the outcome should be as follows.

5.              The decision of the FtT is set aside. It stands only as a record of what was said at the hearing. The nature of the case is such that it is appropriate under section 12 of the 2007 Act, and under Practice Statement 7.2, to remit to the FtT for an entirely fresh hearing. The member(s) of the FtT chosen to consider the case are not to include Judge Gillespie.

6.              No anonymity direction has been requested or made.

 

 

24 January 2019

UT Judge Macleman

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA114972017.html