BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU072772019 & Ors. [2020] UKAITUR HU072772019 (28 January 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2020/HU072772019.html Cite as: [2020] UKAITUR HU72772019, [2020] UKAITUR HU072772019 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber Appeal Numbers: HU/07277/2019
HU/09477/2019
HU/09735/2019
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 27 January 2020 |
On 28 January 2020 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE LANE
Between
[S N] and others
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr Paramjorthy, instructed by Paramount Law
For the Respondent: Mr Whitwell, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant are citizens of India. The first and second appellants are the parents of the third appellant. The appellants appealed against a decision of the respondent dated 2 April 2019 refusing their application for settlement on the basis of long residence. The appellant's appealed to the First-tier Tribunal which, in a decision promulgated on 28 August 2019, dismissed the appeals. The appellants now appeal, with permission, to the Upper Tribunal.
2. At the hearing before the Upper Tribunal on 27 January 2020, both parties' representatives agreed that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal should be set aside. The appellants claim that they did not receive notice of the hearing before the First-tier Tribunal. It is clear that the appellants had sought an oral hearing of their appeals and that the appeals were only dealt with on the papers by the judge because no attendance before the Tribunal on 5 June 2019 had been recorded. I make no comment whatever regarding the merits of the judge's decision and it is clear that he made no error in determining the appeal on the papers on the basis of the information he had received. However, the appellants were entitled to be notified and have an opportunity to attend an oral hearing of their appeals; for some administrative reason or postal error, that opportunity has been denied to them.
Notice of Decision
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal promulgated on 29 August 2019 is set aside. None of the findings of fact shall stand. The appeal is returned to the First-tier Tribunal for that Tribunal to remake the decision following a hearing de novo.
Signed Date 27 January 2020
Upper Tribunal Judge Lane
